Setting of an appropriate driving age has become a controversial issue in the major nations of the world, such as the USA and UK. While it is thought by many that the youth of 18 years is the perfect one, others believe that the minimum should be made 25. This essay intends to delve into both sides of the argument in depth.
To begin with, there are individuals who favour 18, to allow the driving license. Since most of the governments throughout the world issue the right to vote, therefore this means they are mature enough to choose their administration, which in turn, indicates that they can be issued a license to drive the vehicles as well just because of the maturity level. For instance, taking into consideration the understanding of an individual, they can be considered suitable for running the automobiles. This way the advocates of the perspective are somewhat true in thinking so.
On the other hand, those who are against the above view believe that it should be made mandatory only when they reach in the mid 20s. The main reason behind their statement is the experience of the individuals about their surroundings and their knowledge which adds to the advantage. For example, it is well known that up to certain periods most of the youth accomplish their goals and are working liberally, which resembles that they know about what is inappropriate or wrong for them. In this manner, they represent a strong argument for making twenty five comparatively better one for issuing certificates to drive the cars, bikes and much more.
To conclude, despite being an issue of the concern for numerous countries of the world. Some part of the society is considering adult franchise as the most appropriate for driving, whereas others consider 25 to be the best. This essay provided the reasons for their conflicting opinion.
Setting of an appropriate driving age has become a controversial issue in the major nations of the world, such as the USA and UK. While it is
thought
by
many
that the youth of 18 years is the perfect one, others believe that the minimum should
be made
25. This essay intends to delve into both sides of the argument in depth.
To
begin
with, there are individuals who
favour
18, to
allow
the driving license. Since most of the
governments
throughout the world issue the right to vote,
therefore
this means they are mature
enough
to choose their administration, which in turn, indicates that they can
be issued
a license to drive the vehicles
as well
just
because
of the maturity level.
For instance
, taking into consideration the understanding of an individual, they can
be considered
suitable for running the automobiles. This way the advocates of the perspective are somewhat true in thinking
so
.
On the other hand
, those who are against the above view believe that it should
be made
mandatory
only
when they reach in the mid 20s. The main reason behind their statement is the experience of the individuals about their surroundings and their knowledge which
adds
to the advantage.
For example
, it is well known that up to certain periods most of the youth accomplish their goals and are working
liberally
, which resembles that they know about what is inappropriate or
wrong
for them. In this manner, they represent a strong argument for making
twenty five
comparatively
better one for issuing certificates to drive the cars, bikes and much more.
To conclude
, despite being an issue of the concern for numerous countries of the world.
Some
part of the society is considering adult franchise as the most appropriate for driving, whereas others consider 25 to be the best. This essay provided the reasons for their conflicting opinion.