Art is a part of human life, in many countries, people preserve their arts for upcoming generations. Some people believe that the government should provide aid to the artists in order to make them sustain in their field. I partially disagree with this view. Since the funds are allocated from the people's tax, it should be equally spent on all domains which are in a financial predicament.
In this era of modernization, many traditional arts are on the verge of extinction as many people believe that those are out-dated. Despite earning low wages, some artists are still trying to preserve the arts that they are practicing; therefore, the regime should fund them to continue their profession which can be passed down to their future generations. To illustrate, The President of The United States of America has allocated a monthly stipend for those craftsmen who earn less than 500 USD per month. Thus, most of them are tending to continue with their work and arts would be secured.
However, the government should also support the people of other firms who earn minimum remuneration. Since the working population is paying taxes to the government, it must be spent without partiality. There are many impoverished people are struggling to run their life without decent pay. For example, in many countries, a sheer number of farmers have been earning very less pay for many decades and desperately needed help from the regime. Hence, authorities should also concern about other endangering firms like agriculture.
In conclusion, although it is important to support artists financially to prevent art from becoming extinct, the regime should consider other domains as well. I believe, in the future, the authorities of the nation would take steps to address all the issues without biased.
Art
is a part of human life, in
many
countries,
people
preserve their
arts
for upcoming generations.
Some
people
believe that the
government
should provide aid to the artists in order to
make
them sustain in their field. I
partially
disagree with this view. Since the funds
are allocated
from the
people
's tax, it should be
equally
spent on all domains which are in a financial predicament.
In this era of modernization,
many
traditional
arts
are on the verge of extinction as
many
people
believe that those are out-dated. Despite earning low wages,
some
artists are
still
trying to preserve the
arts
that they are practicing;
therefore
, the regime should fund them to continue their profession which can
be passed
down to their future generations. To illustrate, The
President of The United States
of America has allocated a monthly stipend for those craftsmen who earn less than 500 USD per month.
Thus
, most of them are tending to continue with their work and
arts
would
be secured
.
However
, the
government
should
also
support the
people
of other firms who earn minimum remuneration. Since the working population is paying taxes to the
government
, it
must
be spent
without partiality. There are
many
impoverished
people
are struggling to run their life without decent pay.
For example
, in
many
countries, a sheer number of farmers have been earning
very
less pay for
many
decades and
desperately
needed
help
from the regime.
Hence
, authorities should
also
concern about other endangering firms like agriculture.
In conclusion
, although it is
important
to support artists
financially
to
prevent
art
from becoming extinct, the regime should consider other domains
as well
. I believe, in the future, the authorities of the nation would take steps to address all the issues without biased.