Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

more cars in streets

more cars in streets donGr
Controversy exists over whether people will use care less than today. Whereas some may hold the opinion that people no longer employ their car to move to other places, other adhere an opposite direction. However, I would rather vote on the former point of view in that not only has technology changed people's life, but also people tend to a healthier life without cars. The first factor which is convincing enough to favor the former point of vie is that advancements in the technology have changed many aspects of life. It must be emphasized that the significant role of technology can never be neglected, because it has penetrated to every corner and every minute of citizens. With the advent of technology people no longer use cars to move from one location to another since new innovation has provided more convenient and comfortable vehicles which make a trip easy. Take airplane as an example to illustrate this point. Airplane is more efficient for passenger since it provided numerous facilities during trip all around the world. One can order delicious food and beverage from fly attendance or listen to music while there is no need to drive by himself. A further aspect which is worth to be mentioned here is that civilians need more healthy life than these days. What make a car more unsuitable are far more just rigors during driving, that is indeed emitting hazardous gases to atmosphere and creating some diseases. Cars pollute not only air, but also natural resources. Each person in the society needs a healthier life by removing car which is a conspicuous agent of mental and physical problems. A tangible example to illustrate this argument could be people suffering cancer and other uncured diseases. Pollution by cars will pave the road for cancer since polluted air and water have a number of carcinogens which make a serious danger to all citizens. All in all, taking into account all aforementioned factors we safely arrive at the conclusion that in twenty years less cars will be on the streets because healthier life is suitable option for people and technology will provide more convenient vehicles to use. It is high time we stopped overlooking the fact that within two decades cars will be less effective than today.
Controversy exists over whether
people
will
use
care less than
today
. Whereas
some
may hold the opinion that
people
no longer employ their
car
to
move
to other places, other adhere an opposite direction.
However
, I would
rather
vote on the former point of view in that not
only
has
technology
changed
people
's
life
,
but
also
people
tend to a healthier
life
without cars.

The
first
factor which is convincing
enough
to favor the former point of vie is that advancements in the
technology
have
changed
many
aspects of
life
. It
must
be emphasized
that the significant role of
technology
can never
be neglected
,
because
it has penetrated to every corner and every minute of citizens. With the advent of
technology
people
no longer
use
cars
to
move
from one location to another since new innovation has provided more convenient and comfortable vehicles which
make
a trip easy. Take airplane as an example to illustrate this point. Airplane is more efficient for passenger since it provided numerous facilities during trip all around the world. One can order delicious food and beverage from
fly
attendance or listen to music while there is no need to drive by himself.

A
further
aspect which is worth to
be mentioned
here is that civilians
need more healthy
life
than these days. What
make
a
car
more unsuitable are far more
just
rigors during driving,
that is
indeed
emitting hazardous gases to atmosphere and creating
some
diseases.
Cars
pollute not
only
air,
but
also
natural resources. Each person in the society needs a healthier
life
by removing
car
which is a conspicuous agent of mental and physical problems. A tangible example to illustrate this argument could be
people
suffering cancer and other uncured diseases. Pollution by
cars
will pave the road for cancer since polluted air and water have a number of carcinogens which
make
a serious
danger
to all citizens.

All in all, taking into account all aforementioned factors we
safely
arrive at the conclusion that in twenty years less
cars
will be on the streets
because
healthier
life
is suitable option for
people
and
technology
will provide more convenient vehicles to
use
. It is high time we
stopped
overlooking the fact that within two decades
cars
will be less effective than
today
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay more cars in streets

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
379 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts
  • 6band
    using weapon
    The passage asserts that Greek navies used a waepon named burning mirror to attack their enemies which it was made from a polished copper surface to focus sun's rays abd set enemies' ships on fire and provides three reasons of support. The lecture, on the contrary, debunks this passage' claim and sa...
  • 6.5band
    happier life
    Controversy exists over whether people are less happy than they were in the past. Whereas, some may hold the opinion that people have a funny world in these days, while others adhere an opposite direction. However, I would rather vote on the former point of view in that not only has technology chang...
  • 6band
    children part time job
    There are myriad ways to teach children in these days to be successful person in the future both in study and work. Controversy exists over whether for preparing for adult life, children should take part-time job. Some may hold the opinion that having a part-time job is significant channel to attain...
  • 6.5band
    fossil of dinosaur
    The passage asserts that a discovered fossil of a type of dinosaur named Sinosauropteryx shows that that animal had not feathers and provided three reasons of support. The lecture, on the contrary, debunks this idea and says that all evidences in the area is strong and the mentioned reasons provided...
  • 6.5band
    take a job opportunity or wait
    Controvey exists over whether people should select any career is proposed to them right away than wait for ter proposed a favorable job in future. Whereas some may hold the opinion that choosing a job at the first time is wise decision, while others adhere an opposite direction. However, I would rat...
  • 6.5band
    vessel as a battery
    The passage asserts that an ancient vessel contained a copper cylinder discovered in Iraq, was used as battery and provided three reasons of support. The professor rebuts each reason mentioned by the passage and says that all of them are unconvincing. First, the article claims that no wire has atta...





Get more results for topic: