With an increase in the crime-rate in big cities, the government has ramped up security measures here which some people believe has drawbacks. This essay will argue that the benefits of these efforts outweigh the disadvantages. This essay will first explain that these measures have discouraged criminals and allowed people to explore public spaces more safely, followed by how the argument that it intervenes with their freedom is not as extreme.
The rise in security efforts like cameras to monitor public places has deterred the criminals because they know that they are being watched. In comparison to the past, because of the fear of being caught, illegal activities have declined exponentially. For example, The New York Times reported that since 2010 after the installation of camera in remote alleys, the rate of muggings has diminished by almost 40%. Moreover, with the increased sense of safety among the people, they are encouraged to enjoy late night social gatherings without any fear resulting into a lot of leisure businesses like restaurants, bars and night clubs positively flourished. As an illustration of this, in Chicago the business of late night clubs have shot up by 50% in the last decade.
On the contrary, many people argue that the increase in police watch is an unfair interference. They feel that being watched round the clock does not give the public their personal space and make them uncomfortable because their private moments are being recorded. However, this is a baseless scare because the private places are not under surveillance and hence people can still enjoy their intimate time freely. For instance, In restaurants only the general areas like receptions has an oversight and dinner booths are not being watched.
In conclusion, heightened security has declined criminal behaviour and has given an opportunity to the people to celebrate freely which has given a boost to businesses. Owing to this, the merits overshadow an unsubstantiated fright of the surveillance of private places.
With an increase in the crime-rate in
big
cities, the
government
has ramped up security measures here which
some
people
believe has drawbacks. This essay will argue that the benefits of these efforts outweigh the disadvantages. This essay will
first
explain
that these measures have discouraged criminals and
allowed
people
to explore public spaces more
safely
, followed by how the argument that it intervenes with their freedom is not as extreme.
The rise in security efforts like cameras to monitor public places has deterred the criminals
because
they know that they are being
watched
.
In comparison
to the past,
because
of the fear of
being caught
, illegal activities have declined
exponentially
.
For example
, The New York Times reported that since 2010 after the installation of camera in remote alleys, the rate of muggings has diminished by almost 40%.
Moreover
, with the increased sense of safety among the
people
, they
are encouraged
to enjoy late night social gatherings without any fear resulting into
a lot of
leisure businesses like restaurants, bars and night clubs
positively
flourished. As an illustration of this, in Chicago the business of late night clubs have shot up by 50% in the last decade.
On the contrary
,
many
people
argue that the increase in police
watch
is an unfair interference. They feel that being
watched
round the clock does not give the public their personal space and
make
them uncomfortable
because
their private moments are
being recorded
.
However
, this is a baseless scare
because
the private places are not under surveillance and
hence
people
can
still
enjoy their intimate time
freely
.
For instance
, In restaurants
only
the general areas like receptions has an oversight and dinner booths are not being
watched
.
In conclusion
, heightened security has declined criminal
behaviour
and has
given
an opportunity to the
people
to celebrate
freely
which has
given
a boost to businesses. Owing to this, the merits overshadow an unsubstantiated fright of the surveillance of private places.