Over the decades, latest technology has changed the lifestyle of people and that has created great changes in the environment. Some people believe that we should avoid these inventions to overcome resulting problems while others argue that we should utilize the latest mechanization to find answers to this trouble. I will discuss both the side and will give my opinion at the end.
First of all, according to some people, simple lifestyle is the ideal solution of environmental problems. For example, avoiding the use of plastic bags, limited use of vehicles and minimum work of natural resources are the certain ways we can follow to reduce this issue. If we live simple life without relying on applied science, then surely we can get success, because in the past, people did not have such a luxurious lifestyle which could create the environmental issues. To make the modern science available to everyone, today's industries are working day and night and produce tons of carbon dioxide. As a result, we are facing serious issues such as the greenhouse effect. If we live simple life then we do not require such hi-tech equipments and can indirectly reduce emission of carbon in the atmosphere.
On the other side, some people suggest that modern technology should be used to overcome this problem. We have latest facilities that can utilize to recycle waste material, water and other natural resource. This way we can reduce the production of the original products in the industries and reduce the effect of green house. Moreover, we should also focus on fuel efficiency, which can help us to reduce carbon levels in the air. For example, CNG is the best alternative of petrol and diesel which is also an Eco friendly fuel. Furthermore, the Internet can help us to reduce paper waste by storing information online. This way, the proper use of technology can lead us to a concrete solution.
In conclusion, I think that both approaches are equally effective and depend on situations and circumstances, we should adapt them to solve this issue.
Over the decades,
latest
technology has
changed
the lifestyle of
people
and that has created great
changes
in the environment.
Some
people
believe that we should avoid these inventions to overcome resulting problems while others argue that we should utilize the latest mechanization to find answers to this trouble. I will discuss both the side and will give my opinion at the
end
.
First of all
, according to
some
people
, simple lifestyle is the ideal solution of environmental problems.
For example
, avoiding the
use
of plastic bags, limited
use
of vehicles and minimum work of natural resources are the certain ways we can follow to
reduce
this
issue
. If we
live
simple life without relying on applied science, then
surely
we can
get
success,
because
in the past,
people
did not have such a luxurious lifestyle which could create the environmental
issues
. To
make
the modern science available to everyone,
today
's industries are working day and night and produce tons of carbon dioxide.
As a result
, we are facing serious
issues
such as the greenhouse effect. If we
live
simple life then we do not require such hi-tech equipments and can
indirectly
reduce
emission of carbon in the atmosphere.
On the other side,
some
people
suggest that modern technology should be
used
to overcome this problem. We have
latest
facilities that can utilize to recycle waste material, water and other natural resource. This way we can
reduce
the production of the original products in the industries and
reduce
the effect of green
house
.
Moreover
, we should
also
focus on fuel efficiency, which can
help
us to
reduce
carbon levels in the air.
For example
, CNG is the best alternative of petrol and diesel which is
also
an Eco friendly fuel.
Furthermore
, the Internet can
help
us to
reduce
paper waste by storing information online. This way, the proper
use
of technology can lead us to a concrete solution.
In conclusion
, I
think
that both approaches are
equally
effective and depend on situations and circumstances, we should adapt them to solve this
issue
.