many things that used to be done in the home by hand are now being done by machine. does it development bring more advantage or disadvantage? v.1
many things that used to be done in the home by hand are now being done by machine. does it development bring more advantage or disadvantage? v. 1
It is irrefutable that celebrities and politicians are the most renowned people around the globe. While, celebrities do earn more in some countries in comparison to the politicians. I believe it is a positive development as it promotes professionalism.
The entertainment industry, specifically movie culture is booming and mostly because of its global presence. Globalization has allowed the distributors to release movies around the world at the same time, generating worldwide revenues. To illustrate this, the Hollywood, generates two different revenue, one for the USA and another worldwide. Also, rights are sold to streaming partners such as Netflix or Amazon, adding more to the profits. These business models have helped the entertainment industry to generate higher income's for celebrities and everyone else working in the industry.
This development is positive as it makes people realise that being a politician is a noble cause. Many politicians attain the throne just to earn money and show power, as they are least bothered about the development of the nation, something like this would help getting real people into politics. For example, in India, politics is considered a full time job and a great source of income, while in Netherlands, it is considered a social service. It is because, politicians in Netherlands show zeal for the development and not attaining self procurement. Politicians should adopt to work in limited salary as perks are great to go with it.
In conclusion, celebrities earn a lot more than politicians because of the business and revenue models. While, politics is a cause not a profession and should not be weighed with salary.
It is irrefutable that
celebrities
and
politicians
are the most renowned
people
around the globe.
While
,
celebrities
do earn more in
some
countries
in comparison
to the
politicians
. I believe it is a
positive
development
as it promotes professionalism.
The entertainment industry,
specifically
movie culture is booming and
mostly
because
of its global presence. Globalization has
allowed
the distributors to release movies around the world at the same time, generating worldwide revenues. To illustrate this, the Hollywood, generates two
different
revenue, one for the USA and another worldwide.
Also
, rights
are sold
to streaming partners such as Netflix or Amazon, adding more to the profits. These business models have
helped
the entertainment industry to generate higher income's for
celebrities
and everyone else working in the industry.
This
development
is
positive
as it
makes
people
realise
that being a
politician
is a noble cause.
Many
politicians
attain the throne
just
to earn money and
show
power, as they are least bothered about the
development
of the nation, something like this would
help
getting
real
people
into politics.
For example
, in India, politics
is considered
a full time job and a great source of income, while
in Netherlands
, it
is considered
a social service. It is
because
,
politicians
in Netherlands
show
zeal for the
development
and not attaining self procurement.
Politicians
should
adopt to
work in limited salary as perks are great to
go with
it.
In conclusion
,
celebrities
earn a lot more than
politicians
because
of the business and revenue models. While, politics is a cause not a profession and should not
be weighed
with salary.
7.5Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
7.5Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
7.5Mistakes