Some people argue that mandatory sentencing should be used in some criminal cases. However, I would argue that adopting this kid of system is not the best course of action. This essay will discuss both points of view.
There are number of benefits associated with using fixed punishments for crime. Firstly, mandatory sentencing can make the justice system stronger especially when judges are seen to be consistently making decisions that are too lenient. Occasionally, judges do not factor in the expectations of the community particularly in response to violent, sex or repeat offenders. Secondly, mandatory sentencing is considered fair by many people. Oftentimes, the public complains that the rich are given special treatment or that the poor are treated harshly. Fixed punishments could be the answer to these problems.
However, mandatory sentencing is not always the correct response to problems in the justice system. The particular circumstance of a crime or criminal should never be ignored. For example, if a wife has been abused by her husband for many years and one day she snaps and kills him, the justice system should have enough flexibility to treat her differently to someone who murder in a cold calculating matter. Motivation is another key aspect that needs to be factored in when punishing crime. Crimes motivated by greed and power should be judged more harshly than those motivated by desperation and necessity.
In conclusion, although there are some benefits related to fixed punishments, on closer examination, flexibility is critical to having a truly fair justice system. Therefore, I believe that factoring in circumstances and motivation are crucial if true justice is to be handed down.
Some
people
argue that
mandatory
sentencing
should be
used
in
some
criminal cases.
However
, I would argue that adopting this kid of
system
is not the best course of action. This essay will discuss both points of view.
There are number of benefits associated with using
fixed
punishments for
crime
.
Firstly
,
mandatory
sentencing
can
make
the
justice
system
stronger
especially
when judges are
seen
to be
consistently
making decisions that are too lenient.
Occasionally
, judges do not factor in the expectations of the community
particularly
in response to violent, sex or repeat offenders.
Secondly
,
mandatory
sentencing
is considered
fair
by
many
people
. Oftentimes, the public complains that the rich are
given
special treatment or that the poor
are treated
harshly
.
Fixed
punishments could be the answer to these problems.
However
,
mandatory
sentencing
is not always the correct response to problems in the
justice
system
. The particular circumstance of a
crime
or criminal should never be
ignored
.
For example
, if a wife has
been abused
by her husband for
many
years and one day she snaps and kills him, the
justice
system
should have
enough
flexibility to treat her
differently
to someone who murder in a
cold
calculating matter. Motivation is another key aspect that needs to
be factored
in when punishing
crime
.
Crimes
motivated by greed and power should
be judged
more
harshly
than those motivated by desperation and necessity.
In conclusion
, although there are
some
benefits related to
fixed
punishments, on closer examination, flexibility is critical to having a
truly
fair
justice
system
.
Therefore
, I believe that factoring in circumstances and motivation are crucial if true
justice
is to
be handed
down.