Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Many people think that interviews are not the best way to assess the suitability of a candidate for a position. To what extent do you agree or disagree? v.2

Many people think that interviews are not the best way to assess the suitability of a candidate for a position. v. 2
It is crucial for many companies to ensure one's fitness for a job before accepting him. Some people believe that interviews are not favourable for this, while others think that they are the best option. This essay will argue why interviews are not as precise and effective and suggest other means to estimate whether a candidate suites for a position. To begin with, interviews are the most common way to accept someone for a position for a number of reasons, including fast assessment of professional skills and ability to express them in a stressful situation like an interview. The argument goes, that if a person cannot leave a good impression straight away, he would not likely to meet job criteria in future. For instance, when a doctor, who apply for a job, fails to perform a simple procedure, it usually means he is not qualified enough for a position. Thus, interviews are claimed to access one's fitness for work fast and efficiently. Conversely, there is one substantial drawback in interviews which makes them less precise. They usually do not consider the human factor which is present in many applicants in a day of assessment. To illustrate, the candidate's results may be affected by his stress, and interviewers might make wrong conclusions regarding his professional skills. Therefore, for a better accuracy there should be a period of probation, when an employee has a chance to show his fitness to a post. This way, the human factor is less likely to influence his results. To conclude, ensuring one's suitability is vital for employers, although, despite advantages interviews possess, they are not the best way for this. The more precise and effective method, in my opinion, is probation, since human factor is likely to be excluded.
It is crucial for
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
companies
to ensure one's fitness for a job
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
before
accepting him.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Some
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
believe that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interviews
are not
Possible spelling mistake. 'favourable' is British English.
favourable
for this, while others
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
think
that they are the best option. This essay will argue why
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interviews
are not as precise and effective and suggest other means to estimate whether a candidate suites for a position.

To
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
begin
with,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interviews
are the most common way to accept someone for a position for a number of reasons, including
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
fast
assessment of professional
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
skills
and ability to express them in a stressful situation like an
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interview
. The argument goes, that if a person cannot
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
leave
a
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
impression straight away, he would not likely to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
meet
job criteria
Did you mean: "in the future"?
in future
.
For instance
, when a doctor, who apply for a job, fails to perform a simple procedure, it
usually
means he is not qualified
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
enough
for a position.
Thus
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interviews
are claimed
to access one's fitness for work
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
fast
and
efficiently
.

Conversely
, there is one substantial drawback in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interviews
which
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
makes
them less precise. They
usually
do not consider the human factor which is present in
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
applicants in a day of assessment. To illustrate, the candidate's results may be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
affected
by his
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
stress
, and interviewers might
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
wrong
conclusions regarding his professional
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
skills
.
Therefore
, for a better accuracy there should be a period of probation, when an employee has a chance to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
show
his fitness to a post. This way, the human factor is less likely to influence his results.

To conclude
, ensuring one's suitability is vital for employers, although, despite advantages
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
interviews
possess, they are not the best way for this. The more precise and effective method, in my opinion, is probation, since human factor is likely to
be excluded
.
8Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
8Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
8Mistakes

IELTS essay Many people think that interviews are not the best way to assess the suitability of a candidate for a position. v. 2

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
293 words
8
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 8.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 8.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 8.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 8.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts


Recent posts