Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

many people think no-one should be allowed to work at the age of 65. Others say people can still work at 65 y/o as long as they want to. Discuss both views. Give your opinions

many people think no-one should be allowed to work at the age of 65. Others say people can still work at 65 y/o as long as they want to. Give your opinions 0nnn3

Nowadays, it is true that the mandatory retirement age has been extended in many nations and it has been a controversial issue. It is a common belief that people over the age of 65 should not be employed. However, I firmly believe that those employers should not be retired. Thus, this essay will address the reasons for my perspectives as follows. To begin with, plenty of advocates are inclined toward the fact that we are living in a graying society. The latest demographic trend shows that very soon in one of our four people will be over the age of 65. Therefore, can we afford the pension for these numerous populations? 'No' is a definite answer. If these people unemployed, they will be a liability to the government as the government has to provide pensions. Consequently, if they are hired, they not only be a burden but also pay taxes. In addition, there is no denying that they have years of experience as can go to waste if they retire early. Undoubtedly, young people definitely have more strength and work more enthusiastically but the elderly workers know the company like the back of their hand. Furthermore, these employees might spend most of their lifetime with the company or the organization that they have worked for which has created a certain loyalty and faithful in them. They may also be prepared to work for less which is ultimately beneficial for their employer. To sum up, extend the retirement age is a win-win for either the government, the companies, or the elderly people themselves. For these reasons, retiring people over 65 would be an unwise and unpractical decision.

Nowadays, it is true that the mandatory retirement You use this word too often, consider replacing it withyouthmaturitylifeold age
age
 has been extended
 in This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
 nations and it has been a controversial issue. It is a common belief that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 over the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withyouthmaturitylifeold age
age
 of 65 should not be employed
. However
, I firmly
 believe that those employers should not be retired
. Thus
, this essay will address the reasons for my perspectives as follows. To This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :initiatecommence
begin
 with, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:abundance
plenty
 of advocates are inclined
 toward the fact that we are living in a graying society. The latest demographic trend This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :demonstratesportraysindicatesdisplays
shows
 that This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:extremelyimmenselysupremelysuperb
very
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:in the near future
soon
 in one of our four You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 will be over the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withyouthmaturitylifeold age
age
 of 65. Therefore
, can we afford the pension for these numerous populations? 'No' is a This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:certainobvious
definite
 answer. If these You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 unemployed, they will be a liability to the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :national authoritypublic authority
government
 as the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :national authoritypublic authority
government
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:oughts to
has to
 provide pensions. Consequently
, if they are hired
, they not This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 be a burden This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
also
 pay taxes. In addition
, there is no denying that they have years of experience as can go to waste if they retire early. Undoubtedly
, young You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 definitely have more strength and work more enthusiastically
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 the elderly workers know the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :enterprisecorporation
company
 like the back of their hand. Furthermore
, these employees might spend most of their lifetime with the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :enterprisecorporation
company
 or the organization that they have worked for which has created a certain loyalty and faithful in them. They may also
be prepared
 to work for less which is ultimately
 beneficial for their employer. To sum up, extend the retirement You use this word too often, consider replacing it withyouthmaturitylifeold age
age
 is a win-win for either the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :national authoritypublic authority
government
, the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :enterprisescorporations
companies
, or the elderly You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 themselves. For these reasons, retiring You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 over 65 would be an unwise and unpractical decision. 