It is noticeable that there are many old buildings in the modern cities. Whether they should be knocked down to make a way for new buildings triggers an intense discussion. I believe although some old buildings are not suitable for living, many of them need to be protected regarding their economic and cultural value
Admittedly, some old buildings should be torn down due to the safety concerns. Since the architecture technique in the past was not sophisticated enough, the buildings exposes to the danger such as paint falling off, water leakage and poor electricity system. In another words, these buildings could not service the public any more. However, it is not the whole picture. There are still many more historical buildings deserve our protection, and we should not be blind to their worth.
Many historical buildings should be reserved since they can contribute to economic development in those regions. As the symbol of the cities, many old buildings can attract tourists from all over the world. For example, when people visit the classical buildings such as the big Ben in London, the summer palace in Beijing and the Eiffel tower in Paris, they need to pay for the tickets and consume in the surroundings, bringing more revenue for government.
Moreover, government should refurbish the historical heritages due to the implied culture. Visiting old buildings is a vivid way to help us learn about our history. For example, Qilou, a tradition building in Guangzhou, was introduced by colonists because they didn’t get used to the hot weather there. This can remind us of history the colonization. If ancient buildings were knocked down, our next generations could only picture how our ancestors live by their imagination.
In conclusion, many historical buildings serve the functions as economic progress and cultural icons, so government should evaluate their value before replacing them with modern buildings.
It is noticeable that there are
many
old
buildings
in the modern cities. Whether they should
be knocked
down to
make
a way for new
buildings
triggers an intense discussion. I believe although
some
old
buildings
are not suitable for living,
many
of them need to
be protected
regarding their economic and cultural
value
Admittedly
,
some
old
buildings
should
be torn
down due to the safety concerns. Since the architecture technique in the past was not sophisticated
enough
, the
buildings
exposes to the
danger
such as paint falling off, water leakage and poor electricity system. In
another words
, these
buildings
could not service the public
any more
.
However
, it is not the whole picture. There are
still
many
more
historical
buildings
deserve our protection, and we should not be blind to their worth.
Many
historical
buildings
should
be reserved
since they can contribute to economic development in those regions. As the symbol of the cities,
many
old
buildings
can attract tourists from all over the world.
For example
, when
people
visit the classical
buildings
such as the
big Ben
in London, the summer palace in Beijing and the
Eiffel tower
in Paris, they need to pay for the tickets and consume in the surroundings, bringing more revenue for
government
.
Moreover
,
government
should refurbish the
historical
heritages due to the implied culture. Visiting
old
buildings
is a vivid way to
help
us learn about our history.
For example
,
Qilou
, a tradition
building
in Guangzhou,
was introduced
by colonists
because
they didn’t
get
used
to the hot weather there. This can remind us of history the colonization. If ancient
buildings
were knocked
down, our
next
generations could
only
picture how our ancestors
live
by their imagination.
In conclusion
,
many
historical
buildings
serve the functions as economic progress and cultural icons,
so
government
should evaluate their value
before
replacing them with modern
buildings
.