It is often suggested that disciples of tertiary institutions should have a wide range of subjects in their curriculum rather than a few particular subjects. I, however, disagree with this viewpoint primarily for two major reasons.
First, universities aim to provide specialized knowledge to their pupils, not enhance their general knowledge. Students are offered admission to universities after they complete many years of academic studies on various subjects. They are in a tertiary institution primarily to gain specific knowledge related to their field of interest. Giving redundant pressure by imposing subjects unrelated to their field can become a hurdle in achieving the required goal sets in their life. For instance, there is little relationship between sociology and mathematics. Mathematics majors will get confused while learning various aspects of sociology and similarly, sociology students will be reluctant to solve complex mathematics.
In addition to this, many universities are already striving hard to maintain their recognized status and some are providing only specializations in few subjects. The addition of more subjects in each faculty will add unnecessary weight, and as a result, there will be discordant opinions and actions among them. For example, 'Indian Institute of Technology Delhi' is among the top universities in India and provides specialization in scientific research and technology. If they are forced to add Arts related subjects to their science majors, they will soon find themselves struggling for their excellence.
In conclusion, universities are meant for specialization and students should study subjects related to their major or which they feel interested in. The urge to adding a spectrum of irrelevant subjects will detriment the true purpose of university education.
It is
often
suggested that disciples of tertiary institutions should have a wide range of
subjects
in their curriculum
rather
than a few particular
subjects
. I,
however
, disagree with this viewpoint
primarily
for two
major
reasons.
First
,
universities
aim to provide specialized knowledge to their pupils, not enhance their general knowledge. Students
are offered
admission to
universities
after they complete
many
years of academic studies on various
subjects
. They are in a tertiary institution
primarily
to gain specific knowledge related to their field of interest. Giving redundant pressure by imposing
subjects
unrelated to their field can become a hurdle in achieving the required goal sets in their life.
For instance
, there is
little
relationship between sociology and mathematics. Mathematics
majors
will
get
confused while learning various aspects of sociology and
similarly
, sociology students will be reluctant to solve complex mathematics.
In addition
to this,
many
universities
are already striving
hard
to maintain their recognized status and
some
are providing
only
specializations in few
subjects
. The addition of more
subjects
in each faculty will
add
unnecessary weight, and
as a result
, there will be discordant opinions and actions among them.
For example
, 'Indian Institute of Technology Delhi' is among the top
universities
in India and provides specialization in scientific research and technology. If they
are forced
to
add
Arts related
subjects
to their science
majors
, they will
soon
find themselves struggling for their excellence.
In conclusion
,
universities
are meant
for specialization and students should study
subjects
related to their
major
or which they feel interested in. The urge to adding a spectrum of irrelevant
subjects
will detriment the true purpose of
university
education.
9Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
19Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
0Mistakes