Zoo plays vital role by giving information about various species of animals. There split opinions about keeping zoo open or not. Some people believe that zoo should be closed while another group of thinkers supports that zoo have positive impact. Both has its pros and cons. So both the above mentioned views will be discussed below along with my opinion and finally conclusion is deduced.
Examining the former view zoo should be closed. The prime reason is lifestyle of animals is going to change. This is because they don't need to hunt in zoo while they are getting food without working for it. For example survey shows that animals from zoo not tend to survive in forest because they did not use their skills for long time. Furthermore its also point of their freedom. They also deserve to be in open forest rather than being in cage and this leads to loss of species. For example asiantic lion which supposed to be in whole asia but species are getting lose and now we can only find them in sasangir gujarat.
On the contrary the latter view suggest that zoo have plus points because it help us to get education of various living animals. To add to this gathering information about vast number of species and examine their lifestyle can help us to save them from getting lose. Additionally zoo also attract tourist with interest about wildlife. In other word zoo are beneficial by various aspects.
finally in my opinion I firmly support first view. the main justification is we don't supposed to keep animals far from their lifestyle in order to get knowledge. So to conclude there are many supporters of second view but my arguments prove first view is appropriate way to deal with situation.
Zoo plays vital role by giving information about various species of
animals
. There split opinions about keeping zoo open or not.
Some
people
believe that zoo should
be closed
while another group of thinkers supports
that zoo have
positive
impact. Both has its pros and cons.
So
both the above mentioned
views
will
be discussed
below along with my opinion and
finally
conclusion
is deduced
.
Examining the former
view
zoo should
be closed
. The prime reason is lifestyle of
animals
is going to
change
. This is
because
they don't need to hunt in zoo while they are getting food without working for it.
For example
survey
shows
that
animals
from zoo not tend to survive in forest
because
they did not
use
their
skills
for long time.
Furthermore
its
also
point of their freedom. They
also
deserve to be in open forest
rather
than being in cage and this leads to loss of species.
For example
asiantic
lion which supposed to be in whole
asia
but
species are getting lose and
now
we can
only
find them in
sasangir
gujarat
.
On the contrary
the latter
view
suggest
that zoo have
plus points
because
it
help
us to
get
education of various living
animals
. To
add
to this gathering information about vast number of species and examine their lifestyle can
help
us to save them from getting lose.
Additionally
zoo
also
attract tourist with interest about wildlife. In other word zoo are beneficial by various aspects.
finally
in my opinion I
firmly
support
first
view
.
the
main justification is we don't supposed to
keep
animals
far from their lifestyle in order to
get
knowledge.
So
to conclude
there are
many
supporters of second
view
but
my arguments prove
first
view
is
appropriate
way to deal with situation.