Many people argue that the world is utilazing natural sourse quicker than it can be refreshed. The reason why, it is significant to prolong the life of products. governments should prevent people from constantly purchasing more modern or contemporary products. I totally disagree the given idea to some extent restricting the use of modern products and encouraging companies to produce long-lasting products.
To begin with, there is no doubt new technologies are very modern and safety measures. Firstly, nowadays cars much better resours and performance rather than older cars. On of the best example, modern cars has state of the well designed and there are many features such as these cars has camera or internet communicate and among others. And also these functions make cars more reliable and durable for it is users. However older cars produced with ancient technology. Secondly, it is also a part of a modern and diverse world where a person should be equipped with modern products to create comfort and convenience in their life.
On the other hand, it costs a lot of money for durable and long lasting products and this might not able to their hand for poor people. In addition, it has a negative impact on the production of new types of products that require huge investments in new and inexperienced companies. Consequently the unemployment rate might increase. I think the governments should not allow people to buy modern or contemporary products on a regular basis and should therefore tax them
In conclusion, I would like to say that the government should come up with beneficial approaches to different types of people rather than restricting people from using the latest and most advanced products in the development of natural resources.
Word: 280
Many
people
argue that the world is
utilazing
natural
sourse
quicker than it can
be refreshed
. The reason why, it is significant to prolong the life of
products
.
governments
should
prevent
people
from
constantly
purchasing more
modern
or contemporary
products
. I
totally
disagree the
given
idea
to
some
extent restricting the
use
of
modern
products
and encouraging
companies
to produce long-lasting products.
To
begin
with, there is no doubt new technologies are
very
modern
and safety measures.
Firstly
, nowadays
cars
much better
resours
and performance
rather
than older
cars
.
On
of the best example,
modern
cars
has state of the
well designed
and there are
many
features such as these
cars
has camera or internet communicate and among others. And
also
these functions
make
cars
more reliable and durable for it is users.
However
older
cars
produced with ancient technology.
Secondly
, it is
also
a part of a
modern
and diverse world where a person should
be equipped
with
modern
products
to create comfort and convenience in their life.
On the other hand
, it costs
a lot of
money for durable and
long lasting
products
and this might not able to their hand for poor
people
.
In addition
, it has a
negative
impact on the production of new types of
products
that require huge investments in new and inexperienced
companies
.
Consequently
the unemployment rate might increase. I
think
the
governments
should not
allow
people
to
buy
modern
or contemporary
products
on a regular basis and should
therefore
tax
them
In conclusion
, I would like to say that the
government
should
come
up with beneficial approaches to
different
types of
people
rather
than restricting
people
from using the latest and most advanced
products
in the development of natural resources.
Word: 280