Although a significant number of parents believe that mobile phones harm their offspring, others are against this point of view. In this essay, I will discuss both views, and I will show my support for the latter opinion.
On the one hand, those who believe that cell phones are beneficial to their children argue that it made their children safer. This is because these gadgets made their children reachable wherever they can be. As a result, these youngsters can move freely while being contactable by their parents in any case of emergency. For example, research conducted by scientists at Cambridge University in 2019 declared that children who own cell phones are less likely to face emergencies without their families’ presence than their peers by 50%. Had it not been for this communication invention, these children would have been exposed to various dangers on their own.
On the other hand, I believe that children’s cell phones can lead to a dysfunctional family. The reason for this is that these phones reduced the time these youngsters spend with their families. Consequently, these families would suffer from weakened bonds among its members despite how loving the parents can be. Conversely, if these children’s access to mobile phones was limited, they would enjoy the love of their parents. For instance, a paper published by pedagogical experts at the Egyptian ministry of education in 2019 revealed that youngsters who less use their cell phones are more expected to experience a delightful loving family experience.
In conclusion, while a plethora of parents believe that mobile phones are advantageous to their children in terms of safety, I disagree with this because of the risk of dysfunctional families these gadgets can cause.
Although a significant number of
parents
believe
that mobile
phones
harm their offspring, others are against this point of view. In this essay, I will discuss both views, and I will
show
my support for the latter opinion.
On the one hand, those who
believe
that
cell
phones
are beneficial to their
children
argue that it made their
children
safer. This is
because
these gadgets made their
children
reachable wherever they can be.
As a result
, these youngsters can
move
freely
while being contactable by their
parents
in any case of emergency.
For example
, research conducted by scientists at Cambridge University in 2019 declared that
children
who
own
cell
phones
are less likely to face emergencies without their
families’
presence than their peers by 50%. Had it not been for this communication invention, these
children
would have
been exposed
to various
dangers
on their
own
.
On the other hand
, I
believe
that
children’s
cell
phones
can lead to a dysfunctional
family
.
The reason for this is
that these
phones
reduced
the time these youngsters spend with their
families
.
Consequently
, these
families
would suffer from weakened bonds among its members despite how loving the
parents
can be.
Conversely
, if these
children’s
access to mobile
phones
was limited
, they would enjoy the
love
of their
parents
.
For instance
, a paper published by pedagogical experts at the Egyptian ministry of education in 2019 revealed that youngsters who less
use
their
cell
phones
are more
expected
to experience a delightful loving
family
experience.
In conclusion
, while a plethora of
parents
believe
that mobile
phones
are advantageous to their
children
in terms of safety, I disagree with this
because
of the
risk
of dysfunctional
families
these gadgets can cause.
9Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
35Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
0Mistakes