Nowadays, it has been observed that a certain number of places new homes are required, but the open space is available for building them is outside the metro cities. A lion's share of masses ponders that it is must to protect the suburb instead of the conurbation. I agree with the central idea of statement and the following paragraph would highlight my personal perspectives along with apt example.
I see eye to eye with the idea and there are a number of aspects in favour of my point of view. The first compelling reason is that in the past few decades the population is dramatically increased and it is need of the today to develop the countryside to accommodate the people of the country. In other words, the house is one of the basic necessities of the human being and authorities should develop the outer area of the city to accommodate them and it also reduce the over crowd of street inside the cities. Second compelling reason is the traffic snarl. In other words, congestion on the road of cities is also increased along with population gradually which effect on the quality of air and it leads to spread the rampant diseases at the confined place. As a result cities has become overcrowded. For instance, as per the recent news, many abroad countries, encouraging their citizens to move on suburb and it might be helpful to reduce the count of vehicle plying on the city road as a result congestion is also reduced.
Nevertheless, those people reckon that it is important to protect the open space in the vicinity of the city, they have owned their views and I respect them. They believe that conurbation would be lead to scarcity of food and other daily necessities of life and I agree with them, but concurrently I emphasize that in this era, there are no enough open spaces are the left to accommodate the people, hence it is must to develop the countryside at the moment and that only the place which is not suitable for grow the crops.
Eventually, I would like to infer that to develop the countryside is the need of the hour due to not available much open places in the cities, but it should be developed only that place which is not suitable for growing the crops.
Nowadays, it has
been observed
that a certain number of
places
new homes
are required
,
but
the
open
space is available for building them is outside the metro
cities
. A lion's share of masses ponders that it is
must to
protect the suburb
instead
of the conurbation. I
agree
with the central
idea
of statement and the following paragraph would highlight my personal perspectives along with apt example.
I
see
eye to eye with the
idea
and there are a number of aspects in
favour
of my point of view. The
first
compelling reason is that in the past few decades the population is
dramatically
increased and it
is need
of the
today
to
develop
the countryside to accommodate the
people
of the country.
In other words
, the
house
is one of the
basic necessities
of the human being and authorities should
develop
the outer area of the city to accommodate them and it
also
reduce
the over crowd of street inside the
cities
. Second compelling reason is the traffic snarl.
In other words
, congestion on the road of
cities
is
also
increased along with population
gradually
which effect on the quality of air and it leads to spread the rampant diseases at the confined
place
.
As
a result
cities
has become overcrowded.
For instance
, as per the recent news,
many
abroad countries, encouraging their citizens to
move
on suburb and it might be helpful to
reduce
the count of vehicle plying on the city road
as a result
congestion is
also
reduced
.
Nevertheless
, those
people
reckon that it is
important
to protect the
open
space in the vicinity of the city, they have
owned
their views and I respect them. They believe that conurbation would be lead to scarcity of food and other daily necessities of life and I
agree
with them,
but
concurrently
I emphasize that in this era, there are no
enough
open
spaces are the
left
to accommodate the
people
,
hence
it is
must to
develop
the countryside at the moment and that
only
the
place
which is not suitable for grow the crops.
Eventually
, I would like to infer that to
develop
the countryside is the need of the hour due to not available much
open
places
in the
cities
,
but
it should
be developed
only
that
place
which is not suitable for growing the crops.