Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nation’s history. Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by news ones. How important is it to maintain old buildings? Should history stand in the way of progress? v.7
Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nation’s history. Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by news ones. How important is it to maintain old buildings? Should history stand in the way of progress? v. 7
Many modern of cities have the laws to safe old of buildings which it changes national of buildings. But, some humans think that the buildings, destroy and other new buildings put to it places. However, many old buildings are protected by laws. I agree with the following statement which older buildings are protected.
First, this is true of the ways which is older buildings are protected by laws because the old buildings are giving value of information about our past. And people take so much profits. For examples, The Registon is older of place in my country that it is attracted many tourists, scientists and historians as well as also other old buildings have in my county. Thus, the older buildings need to be protected from knocking down because they give so much information about the past. I think the old buildings are entering to the national wealth of counties.
On the other hand, the government of laws is supported with protection older buildings. But, some people view they should be destroyed and exchange with new ones. For instance, the old building is changed a necessary in places which as hotels, house and another. However, it can be coming to issue in society and for this is paid a lot of money. Thus, the old buildings are changed to profits existing for people.
In conclusion, the older buildings need to be protected from knocking down by laws a part of a nation past's that buildings are how much there are important people's to live, because the old buildings are given information about their past.
Many
modern of cities have the
laws
to safe
old
of
buildings
which it
changes
national of
buildings
.
But
,
some
humans
think
that the
buildings
,
destroy
and other new
buildings
put to it places.
However
,
many
old
buildings
are
protected
by
laws
. I
agree
with the following statement which
older
buildings
are protected
.
First
, this is true of the ways which is
older
buildings
are
protected
by
laws
because
the
old
buildings
are giving value of information about our past. And
people
take
so
much
profits. For examples, The
Registon
is
older
of place in my country that it
is attracted
many
tourists, scientists and historians
as well
as
also
other
old
buildings
have in my county.
Thus
, the
older
buildings
need to be
protected
from knocking down
because
they give
so
much information about the past. I
think
the
old
buildings
are entering to the national wealth of counties.
On the other hand
, the
government
of
laws
is supported
with protection
older
buildings
.
But
,
some
people
view they should be
destroyed
and exchange with new ones.
For instance
, the
old
building
is
changed
a necessary in places which as hotels,
house
and another.
However
, it can be coming to issue in society and for this
is paid
a lot of
money.
Thus
, the
old
buildings
are
changed
to profits existing for
people
.
In conclusion
, the
older
buildings
need to be
protected
from knocking down by
laws
a part of a nation past's that
buildings
are how much there are
important
people
's to
live
,
because
the
old
buildings
are
given
information about their past.
7.5Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
7.5Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
7.5Mistakes