Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Many newspapers, magazines and television programs make money by reporting on the private lives of public figures such as politicians, sports personalities and entertainers. While the media’s right to freedom of expression should be defended, the media should not intrude into people’s private affairs. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Many newspapers, magazines and television programs make money by reporting on the private lives of public figures such as politicians, sports personalities and entertainers. While the media’s right to freedom of expression should be defended, the media should not intrude into people’s private affairs. with this statement? Nrw50
The media’s freedom of expression is an essential safeguard in a free society. However, it is often suggested that there should be limits to the media’s right to report on the private lives of public figures. There are a number of arguments both in favour of and against this view. Firstly, it is argued that politicians should not be the objects of media scrutiny outside their work and that the media should not report information about them, such as details of their relationships, which is generally considered private. However, the counter- argument is that there are some politicians who use privacy laws to cover up embarrassing information, for example, when they have accepted gifts in return for using their influence. In other words, it is sometimes in the public interest for the media to investigate politician’s private lives to reveal and deter such corruption. A further argument is that the media is more interested in making money that in telling the truth. Stories of scandals involvig well-known people increase newspaper circulatiion and attract larger the inconvenieces as well as the benefits this brings. A final argument is that when media reports on famous people’s private relationships, it often puts these relationships under tremendous pressure that they fail. On the other hand, opponents of this argument say that many celebrities promote themselves by publicising their private affairs in the media, and only complain about an invasion of privacy when problem arise. In conclusion, I believe that public figures have to expect some media scrutiny of their private lives. In the case of entertainment or sports celebrities, this reflects a market for stories about them, which is part of being famous and earning large amount of money. In the case of politicians, it is the media’s duty to examine and report on the behaviour of people in positions of power.
The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
media’s
freedom of expression is an essential safeguard in a free society.
However
, it is
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
often
suggested that there should be limits to the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
media’s
right to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
report
on the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
private
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
lives
of public figures. There are a number of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
arguments
both in
Possible spelling mistake. 'favour' is British English.
favour
of and against this view.

Firstly
, it
is argued
that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
politicians
should not be the objects of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
media
scrutiny outside their work and that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
media
should not
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
report
information about them, such as
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
details
of their relationships, which is
generally
considered
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
private
.
However
, the counter-
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
argument
is that there are
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
politicians
who
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
privacy laws to cover up embarrassing information,
for example
, when they have
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
accepted
gifts in return for using their influence.
In other words
, it is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
sometimes
in the public interest for the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
media
to investigate
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
politician’s
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
private
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
lives
to reveal and deter such corruption.

A
further
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
argument
is that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
media
is more interested in making money that in telling the truth. Stories of scandals
Possible spelling mistake found.
involvig
well-known
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
increase newspaper
Possible spelling mistake found.
circulatiion
and attract larger the
Possible spelling mistake found.
inconvenieces
as well
as the benefits this brings.

A final
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
argument
is that when
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
media
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reports
on
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
famous
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
’s
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
private
relationships, it
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
often
puts these relationships under tremendous pressure that they fail.
On the other hand
, opponents of this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
argument
say that
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
celebrities promote themselves by
Possible spelling mistake. 'publicising' is British English.
publicising
their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
private
affairs in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
media
, and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
complain about an invasion of privacy when problem arise.

In conclusion
, I believe that public figures
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
have to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
expect
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
media
scrutiny of their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
private
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
lives
. In the case of entertainment or sports celebrities, this reflects a market for stories about them, which is part of being
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
famous
and earning large amount of money.
Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
In
the case of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
politicians
, it is the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
media’s
duty to examine and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
report
on the
Possible spelling mistake. 'behaviour' is British English.
behaviour
of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
in positions of power.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Many newspapers, magazines and television programs make money by reporting on the private lives of public figures such as politicians, sports personalities and entertainers. While the media’s right to freedom of expression should be defended, the media should not intrude into people’s private affairs. with this statement?

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
308 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • Many newspapers, magazines and television programs make money by reporting on the private lives of public figures such as politicians, sports personalities and entertainers. While the media’s right to freedom of expression should be defended, the media should not intrude into people’s private affairs. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?