One of the most controversial issues today related to allocation of more money in public transports and less cash on roads by the government. In my opinion, the advantages of this tendency outweighs the drawbacks, because despite improving of roads can be more useful for country’s economy, it is more favorable for environment, this kind of investing prevents spread of natural problems such as air pollution.
Those that mainly agree with this benefit point out of the fact that development of municipal transportation is more eco-friendly than improvement of highways by the putting up money of government. Particularly lack of roads would lead to less number of cars, which produce the significant part of air particles and harmful gases in the atmosphere such as CO, in comparison with public transports like subways, which use an electricity to move and do not increase the level of damaging gases in the atmosphere. A particularly good example here is case, when the government of Singapore decided to tackle problem of air pollution, to achieve their goal, the government refused from investing of cash in ways and started to develop system of public transportation. After few months level of pollutants in the atmosphere steadily dropped by just over a tenth. Consequently, the main advantage of this trend is helpful for solving some environmental issues.
One major disadvantage is possible deterioration of republic’s economy. The main reason for believing this is that good roads guarantees the majority of people, who want to buy and use cars, subsequently the more cars are in town, the more petrol are required and sold. Usage of municipal transports cannot effect positively on economic system of country, because electricity does not cost much and price of ticket is not high to get economical profit. For instance, it is a wide-known fact that Germany’s national economy is based on car industry, there is no impact of public transportation, because of this, the government of Germany provides approximately 1 million euros for improving roads to cause more using of cars, and the government spends only 100000 euros for buying public transports. Therefore, developed countries pay attention to improvement of roads to get income in the future, because municipals transports cannot do more good, so this tendency can lead to degradation of economy.
To sum up, despite less putting up money in roads can lead to lost of profit and negative effect on economy of country, I believe that investing cash in system of public transportation has more significant benefit like environmental friendliness.
One of the most controversial issues
today
related to allocation of more money in
public
transports
and less cash on
roads
by the
government
. In my opinion, the advantages of this tendency outweighs the drawbacks,
because
despite improving of
roads
can be more useful for
country’s
economy
, it is more favorable for environment, this kind of investing
prevents
spread of natural problems such as air pollution.
Those that
mainly
agree
with this benefit point out of the fact that development of municipal
transportation
is more eco-friendly than improvement of highways by the putting up money of
government
.
Particularly
lack of
roads
would lead to less number of
cars
, which produce the significant part of air particles and harmful gases in the atmosphere such as CO,
in comparison
with
public
transports
like subways, which
use
an electricity to
move
and do not increase the level of damaging gases in the atmosphere. A
particularly
good
example here is case, when the
government
of Singapore decided to tackle problem of air pollution, to achieve their goal, the
government
refused from investing of cash in ways and
started
to develop system of
public
transportation
.
After
few months level of pollutants in the atmosphere
steadily
dropped by
just
over a tenth.
Consequently
, the main advantage of this trend is helpful for solving
some
environmental issues.
One major disadvantage is possible deterioration of republic’s
economy
. The main reason for believing this is that
good
roads
guarantees the majority of
people
, who want to
buy
and
use
cars
,
subsequently
the more
cars
are in town, the more petrol
are required
and sold. Usage of municipal
transports
cannot effect
positively
on economic system of
country
,
because
electricity does not cost much and price of ticket is not high to
get
economical profit.
For instance
, it is a wide-known fact that Germany’s national
economy
is based
on
car
industry, there is no impact of
public
transportation
,
because of this
, the
government
of Germany provides approximately 1 million euros for improving
roads
to cause more using of
cars
, and the
government
spends
only
100000 euros for buying
public
transports
.
Therefore
, developed
countries
pay attention to improvement of
roads
to
get
income in the future,
because
municipals
transports
cannot do more
good
,
so
this tendency can lead to degradation of economy.
To sum up, despite less putting up money in
roads
can lead to lost of profit and
negative
effect on
economy
of
country
, I believe that investing cash in system of
public
transportation
has more significant benefit like environmental friendliness.