Lots of countries announce international sports events, while some nations do not organise sports events. There are more benefits than drawbacks to host countries and some countries have losses as well. This essay will discuss that it is more beneficial to countries who organise the international sports events.
Countries who host international sports events like Olympic games have more benefits in terms of marketing of that particular city of the country, increase in tourism industry and the world’s finest sporting venues and so on. Many tourists visit host country and explore it. For example, Barcelona put on the global map due to successfully host Olympic games. Moreover, sports events attract many tourists and businesses to invest in that country. For these reasons, more countries are desiring for international sports events for their country’s growth.
Conversely, some of the countries are not ready to invest money by hosting international sports events such as Olympic. These countries think that after the Olympic games, stadiums will be left unused, during the sports event may local public face inconvenience and congestion. Due to these some public may riot for wasted money on sports event rather than country’s development, and international sports event may be unsuccessful too. For instance, the Olympic stadiums after the games are useless. In addition, host cities may have to bear losses from unsuccessful sports events such as Montreal and Athens are examples of unsuccessful sports events. Moreover, the money which is invested on the games are inefficient after the games get over.
In conclusion, most countries believe in hosting international sports event to gain popularity worldwide unlike the some of the countries do not support international sports event for their internal issues with the public. Ultimately, host countries open up their ways of growing economy. 
Lots of  
countries
 announce  
international
  sports
  events
, while  
some
 nations do not  
organise
  sports
  events
. There are more benefits than drawbacks to  
host
  countries
 and  
some
  countries
 have losses  
as well
. This essay will discuss that it is more beneficial to  
countries
 who  
organise
 the  
international
  sports
  events
.
Countries who  
host
  international
  sports
  events
 like Olympic  
games
 have more benefits in terms of marketing of that particular city of the  
country
, increase in tourism industry and the world’s finest sporting venues and  
so
 on.  
Many
 tourists visit  
host
  country
 and explore it.  
For example
, Barcelona put on the global map due to  
successfully
  host
 Olympic  
games
.  
Moreover
,  
sports
  events
 attract  
many
 tourists and businesses to invest in that  
country
. For these reasons, more  
countries
 are desiring for  
international
  sports
  events
 for their  
country’s
 growth. 
Conversely
,  
some of the
  countries
 are not ready to invest money by hosting  
international
  sports
  events
 such as Olympic. These  
countries
  think
 that after the Olympic  
games
, stadiums will be  
left
 unused, during the  
sports
  event
 may local public face inconvenience and congestion. Due to these  
some
 public may riot for wasted money on  
sports
  event
  rather
 than  
country’s
 development, and  
international
  sports
  event
 may be unsuccessful too.  
For instance
, the Olympic stadiums after the  
games
 are useless.  
In addition
,  
host
 cities may  
have to
 bear losses from unsuccessful  
sports
  events
 such as Montreal and Athens are examples of unsuccessful  
sports
  events
.  
Moreover
, the money which  
is invested
 on the  
games
 are inefficient after the  
games
  get
 over. 
In conclusion
, most  
countries
 believe in hosting  
international
  sports
  event
 to gain popularity worldwide unlike the  
some of the
  countries
 do not support  
international
  sports
  event
 for their internal issues with the public.  
Ultimately
,  
host
  countries
 open up their ways of growing economy.