Search
Tools
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Many believe that it is important to protect all wild animals, while some think that it is important to protect some, not all of them. Discuss both views and give your opinion

Many believe that it is important to protect all wild animals, while some think that it is important to protect some, not all of them. Discuss both views and give your opinion jQnMM

Wild animals form a crucial part of our ecosystem. In this era, it is believed by some people that it is vital to protect all animal species whereas some consider that saving only few of them is important. In my opinion the former is true that we should save all animals species to maintain proper balance in our surroundings. I will discuss my views in the forthcoming paragraphs. To begin with, many people believe that protecting all the wild animals will create an ecological balance between the species because each animal is interlinked to each other via food chain. Moreover, any imbalance in this food chain will ultimately lead to the imbalance in the environment. For example, animals who eat insects will die with hunger if insects will not be conserved and the whole food chain will be disturbed. Hence, to have a balanced ecosystem, techniques should be introduced to protect all wild animals. Also nowadays, measures are being taken to protect the rare species of wild animals such as white tigers and cheetah. On the other hand, it is the belief of many people that it is only crucial to protect some wild animals instead of conserving all. Furthermore, they consider that these animal species are a threat to the environment as they are fierce. Also, they consider that if all wildlife species are saved this will increase their population and more land will be converted into forest to provide them food and shelter. Therefore to avoid such situation they want that not all wildlife should be protected. In conclusion, people who believe that conserving all wild animals is not important does not understand the need of wildlife for the environment. Thus, for healthy and peaceful surrounding it is crucial that we should protect all wildlife species. Moreover, the government should also focus on the conservation of the species which, if not considered serious can impose threat and imbalance environment.

Wild You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 form a crucial part of our ecosystem. In this era, it is believed
 by This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 that it is vital to You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpreservesafeguardshieldshelterdefendcover
protect
 all You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnaturalbodily
animal
 species whereas This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 consider that saving This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 few of them is This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:vitalcriticalessential
important
. In my opinion the former is true that we should save all You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 species to maintain proper balance in our surroundings. I will discuss my views in the forthcoming paragraphs.

To This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :initiatecommence
begin
 with, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 believe that protecting all the wild You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 will create an ecological balance between the species This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 each You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnaturalbodily
animal
is interlinked
 to each other via You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfeedcuisinesnackmeatdrinkfoodstuff
food
 chain. Moreover
, any imbalance in this You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfeedcuisinesnackmeatdrinkfoodstuff
food
 chain will ultimately
 lead to the imbalance in the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstatusclimatehabitatsurroundingssettingsituation
environment
. For example
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 who eat insects will This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :pass away
die
 with hunger if insects will not be conserved
 and the whole You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfeedcuisinesnackmeatdrinkfoodstuff
food
 chain will be disturbed
. Hence
, to have a balanced ecosystem, techniques should be introduced
 to You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpreservesafeguardshieldshelterdefendcover
protect
 all wild You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
. Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?Also,
Also
 nowadays, measures are being taken
 to You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpreservesafeguardshieldshelterdefendcover
protect
 the rare species of wild You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 such as white tigers and cheetah.

On the other hand
, it is the belief of This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 that it is This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 crucial to You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpreservesafeguardshieldshelterdefendcover
protect
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 wild You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
instead
 of conserving all. Furthermore
, they consider that these You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnaturalbodily
animal
 species are a threat to the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstatusclimatehabitatsurroundingssettingsituation
environment
 as they are fierce. Also
, they consider that if all You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbodylivingwomansurvivalsoulperson
wildlife
 species are saved
 this will increase their population and more land will be converted
 into forest to provide them You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfeedcuisinesnackmeatdrinkfoodstuff
food
 and shelter. Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?Therefore,
Therefore
 to avoid such situation they want that not all You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbodylivingwomansurvivalsoulperson
wildlife
 should be protected
.

In conclusion
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 who believe that conserving all wild You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 is not This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:vitalcriticalessential
important
 does not understand the need of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbodylivingwomansurvivalsoulperson
wildlife
 for the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstatusclimatehabitatsurroundingssettingsituation
environment
. Thus
, for healthy and peaceful surrounding it is crucial that we should You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpreservesafeguardshieldshelterdefendcover
protect
 all You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbodylivingwomansurvivalsoulperson
wildlife
 species. Moreover
, the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :national authoritypublic authority
government
 should also
 focus on the conservation of the species which, if not considered serious can impose threat and imbalance You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstatusclimatehabitatsurroundingssettingsituation
environment
. 