Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Many animals loss their life in merciless wilderness unnoticed. Why can’t we use some of them for research and testing?

Many animals loss their life in merciless wilderness unnoticed. Why can’t we use some of them for research and testing? oRboB
Most people dislike unnecessary Killing of animals. Every creature on this earth feed on some other plant or animal. Life in the wilderness is cruel and merciless. Many animals die of starvation due to drought, winter, and carnivorous animals kill smaller animals for a meal. Many healings and baby animals give their life to predators. Only a minuscule fraction of baby animals survives in wilderness escaping the hands of predators. Again killing and farm animals and fish is a way of life all over the world. The human race is continuing to develop medicines, food and knowledge to help animals survive and grow. There are a many life saving drugs, vaccines and improved food items are now available for animals developed by biological scientists. Cattle herds and poultry have taken better care because of their economic value. Many organizations and activists strive to save wildlife and protect their habitat from human disturbance. There is a worldwide awareness about the conservation of animals and their habitat. Special programs are being taken from endangered animals. So we can say that it's no that we are only interested to cause harm to animals, we also are quite aware of their interest. In conclusion, we can say that If we want to introduce new food items, drugs, or any such thing, we have to get them tested, preferably on test animals, before you apply them to human beings. We don’t have any other option other than testing the developments in the biological sciences on animals. If there is any lifeless alternative available, presumably scientist will prefer to test for inanimate things, given that both alternatives are producing same reliable results. We should bear in mind that not all the test animals suffer from the effects; often the outcome is harmless to the animal.
Most
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
dislike unnecessary Killing of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
. Every creature on this earth feed on
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
other plant or
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Life
in the wilderness is cruel and merciless.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Many
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
die
of starvation due to drought, winter, and carnivorous
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
kill smaller
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
for a meal.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Many
Possible spelling mistake found.
healings
and baby
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
give their
Did you mean "lives"?
life
to predators.
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
Only
a minuscule fraction of baby
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
survives in wilderness escaping the hands of predators. Again killing and farm
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
and fish is a way of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
life
all over the world.

The human race is continuing to develop medicines, food and knowledge to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
help
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
survive and grow. There are a
Use "much" or "little" with uncountable nouns.
many
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
life
saving drugs, vaccines and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
improved
food items are
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
now
available for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
developed by biological scientists. Cattle herds and poultry have taken better care
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
of their economic value.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Many
organizations and activists strive to save wildlife and protect their habitat from human disturbance. There is a worldwide awareness about the conservation of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
and their habitat. Special programs are
being taken
from endangered
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
So
we can say that it's
Did you mean "now" (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
no
that we are
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
interested to cause harm to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
, we
also
are quite aware of their interest.

In conclusion
, we can say that If we want to introduce new food items, drugs, or any such thing, we
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
have to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
get
them
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
tested
,
preferably
on
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
test
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
before
you apply them to human beings. We don’t have any other option other than testing the developments in the biological sciences on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
. If there is any lifeless alternative available, presumably scientist will prefer to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
test
for inanimate things,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
that both alternatives are producing same reliable results. We should bear in mind that not all the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
test
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
suffer from the effects;
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
often
the outcome is harmless to the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Many animals loss their life in merciless wilderness unnoticed. Why can’t we use some of them for research and testing?

Essay
  American English
3 paragraphs
299 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts