It is irrefutable that, animals play an imperative role to maintaining the ecological balancec on a earth. Although, some people believe that merely protect that fauna which are needed or useful but I opined in reverse manner and disagree to the given statement. My inclination is justified in following paragraphs.
To commence with, Out of all the arguments my strongest one to prove my is that, all animals are part of ecocycle and needed to help maintaining the balance on earth. In other words, fauna, flora, humans, birds, etcetera part of earth ecosystems and helpful to make balance on earth. A good example for this is, in a number of studies it is proved that by putting animals in to endangered, several people breaking our food chain on earth and making earth worst place to live. Besides this, it is also true that, humans have no right to take any kind of dicission regarding not helping endangered animals. To be more precise, humans are intelligent animal on earth, that does not mean that humans have a any right to wipe out animals by using them for own purpose. Consequently, all the animals have a right to live.
Furthermore, the other robust point to prove my side is that, humans can save animals life rather than hiking them. By this I mean that, humans can hinder hunting and poching of endangered animals. Additionally, government ought to make one legislation imperative to save animals. To cite an example, from last few decades Indian government is trying to save lion and somehow they are successful in their endeavor. Hence, in lieu of killing animals, humans should try to save them.
Thus, to wrap up the discussion, it can be said that despite putting animals in to peril everyone ought to save and aid animals by not hunting and selling them and also maintain earth ecosystems balance.
It is irrefutable that,
animals
play an imperative role to maintaining the ecological
balancec on
a
earth
. Although,
some
people
believe that
merely
protect that fauna which
are needed
or useful
but
I opined in reverse manner and disagree to the
given
statement. My inclination
is justified
in following paragraphs.
To commence with, Out of all the arguments my strongest one to prove my is that, all
animals
are part of
ecocycle
and needed to
help
maintaining
the balance on
earth
.
In other words
, fauna, flora,
humans
, birds, etcetera part of
earth
ecosystems and helpful to
make
balance on
earth
. A
good
example for this is, in a number of studies it
is proved
that by putting
animals
in to endangered, several
people
breaking our food chain on
earth
and making
earth
worst
place to
live
.
Besides
this, it is
also
true that,
humans
have no right to take any kind of
dicission
regarding not helping endangered
animals
. To be more precise,
humans
are intelligent
animal
on
earth
, that does not mean that
humans
have
a
any right to wipe out
animals
by using them for
own
purpose.
Consequently
, all the
animals
have a right to
live
.
Furthermore
, the other robust point to prove my side is that,
humans
can
save
animals
life
rather
than hiking them. By this I mean that,
humans
can hinder hunting and
poching
of endangered
animals
.
Additionally
,
government
ought to
make
one legislation imperative to
save
animals
. To cite an example, from last few decades Indian
government
is trying to
save
lion and somehow they are successful in their endeavor.
Hence
, in lieu of killing
animals
,
humans
should try to
save
them.
Thus
, to wrap up the discussion, it can
be said
that despite putting
animals
in to peril everyone ought to
save
and aid
animals
by not hunting and selling them and
also
maintain
earth
ecosystems balance.