In the current time, a plethora of citizens move from the rural area to the urban area with various rationales. A school of thought hold that having a healthy lifestyle in the countryside is simpler than living in cities, whereas others tend to have opposite view. Personally, I completely concur with the latter, and I will justify both sides in the upcoming paragraph.
To commence with, it is understandable why the masses endorse dwelling in the suburban. This is in the light of the fact that presidents living in here can avoid the traffic gridlock. As the result, this can mitigate noise pollution and have a fresher atmosphere. Moreover, a wide range of plants, old trees cultivated provide oxygen gas for humankind. Thus, people can reduce health issues by numerous methods. However, this line has been flawed. This is owing to the fact that not only countryside places but also metropolis places have green trees. Therefore, while the former opinion is valid to a certain extent, there are enormous health benefits when individuals settling in the metropolis.
Although this former view brings various merits for the health life, the latter also has multiple benefits. These days, governments built a plenty of community parks with green trees, birds and some sport facilities. This is place where urbanites gather with their families and peers through sitting on the grass, doing exercise, breathing fresh air. Moreover, hospital centers or phamarcities also are set up in the heart of city. For instance, it finds convenient for the inner to take care themselves without time-wasting movement. Consequently, these reasons would clearly go a long way towards living in the city also has a health lifestyle.
In conclude, living in the heart of city maybe high cost-living. In my perspective, there are numerous reasons why citizens should dwell in the inner to have health benefits.
In the
current
time, a plethora of citizens
move
from the rural area to the urban area with various rationales. A school of
thought
hold that having a healthy lifestyle in the countryside is simpler than
living
in
cities
, whereas others tend to have opposite view.
Personally
, I completely concur with the latter, and I will justify both sides in the upcoming paragraph.
To commence with, it is understandable why the masses endorse dwelling in the suburban. This is in the light of the fact that presidents
living
in here can avoid the traffic gridlock. As the result, this can mitigate noise pollution and have a fresher atmosphere.
Moreover
, a wide range of plants,
old
trees cultivated provide oxygen gas for humankind.
Thus
,
people
can
reduce
health
issues by numerous methods.
However
, this line has
been flawed
. This is owing to the fact that not
only
countryside places
but
also
metropolis places have green trees.
Therefore
, while the former opinion is valid to a certain extent, there are enormous
health
benefits when individuals settling in the metropolis.
Although this former view brings various merits for the
health
life, the latter
also
has multiple benefits. These days,
governments
built a
plenty
of community parks with green trees,
birds
and
some
sport facilities. This is place where urbanites gather with their families and peers through sitting on the grass, doing exercise, breathing fresh air.
Moreover
, hospital centers or
phamarcities
also
are set
up in the heart of city.
For instance
, it finds convenient for the inner to take care themselves without time-wasting movement.
Consequently
, these reasons would
clearly
go a long way towards
living
in the city
also
has a
health
lifestyle.
In conclude,
living
in the heart of city maybe high cost-living. In my perspective, there are numerous reasons why citizens should dwell in the inner to have
health
benefits.