It is argued that instead of increasing the number of paper books in libraries, they ought to enhance their resources which relies on technologies. I totally agree with this view because technologies compared to paper books are more convenient and easy to maintain.
Using technologies in libraries such as computers or tablets offer more convenience. This is due to the fact that technologies present various features such as they are faster. When readers want to search for a book, they immediately type the name of the book in the search option and in seconds they obtain it, while in libraries, readers have to search between hundreds of books to find what they want which is time consuming. Moreover, reading from a computer might help some people, especially seniors, which have sight problems to read with ease. This is because computers have the zoom option which can make words up to ten times bigger, therefore, it is more useful for elderly people or people who have sight issues. For example, Birmingham Library increased the number of computers because 70% of the readers in use them.
In addition, technologies are easier to maintain and have a larger capacity to store books. Libraries have a limited space in order to store paper books, whereas, many technologies can store unlimited number of books. Furthermore, maintaining books in libraries means that every period of time they need to be cleaned and re-arranged but having books on computers can save people who work in libraries from this duty a re-arranging them with a finger click. For instance, a study conducted by Cambridge university revealed that by using computers in the university library, they saved 80% of the library staff time.
In conclusion, I believe that technologies should be the primary interest in libraries to enhance because technologies are easier to maintain and faster to use by readers and library workers than books.
It
is argued
that
instead
of increasing the number of paper
books
in libraries, they ought to enhance their resources which relies on
technologies
. I
totally
agree
with this view
because
technologies
compared to paper
books
are more convenient and easy to maintain.
Using
technologies
in libraries such as computers or tablets offer more convenience.
This is due to the fact that
technologies
present various features such as they are faster. When readers want to search for a
book
, they immediately type the name of the
book
in the search option and in seconds they obtain it, while in libraries, readers
have to
search between hundreds of
books
to find what they want which is
time consuming
.
Moreover
, reading from a computer might
help
some
people
,
especially
seniors, which have sight problems to read with
ease
. This is
because
computers have the zoom option which can
make
words up to ten times bigger,
therefore
, it is more useful for elderly
people
or
people
who have sight issues.
For example
, Birmingham Library increased the number of computers
because
70% of the readers in
use
them.
In addition
,
technologies
are easier to maintain and have a larger capacity to store
books
. Libraries have a limited space in order to store paper
books
, whereas,
many
technologies
can store unlimited number of
books
.
Furthermore
, maintaining
books
in libraries means that every period of time they need to
be cleaned
and re-arranged
but
having
books
on computers can save
people
who work in libraries from this duty a re-arranging them with a finger click.
For instance
, a study conducted by Cambridge university revealed that by using computers in the university library, they saved 80% of the library staff time.
In conclusion
, I believe that
technologies
should be the primary interest in libraries to enhance
because
technologies
are easier to maintain and faster to
use
by readers and library workers than
books
.