Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

laws regulating censorships

laws regulating censorships M3WDo
Nowadays, the absolute majority of governments of the countries maintain the censorship of mass media, and, for instance, consumed the Internet’s and TV’s content. In modern world, in many countries it can be observed the forbidden web-sites, videos, articles and literature. On the one hand, information that has to be hidden from media consumers exists. In particular, terroristic slogans, any types of appeals to violence and oppressive statements. On the other hand, the presence of law, that admits even bounded opportunity to government to regulate consumed content, gives a strong ability to impose unnecessarily deep and limiting censorships. I’m completely against established foundations. I think laws regulating censorships, should limit the possibilities of government to restricting media’s freedom of speech. All things considered, the number of benefits isn’t large. However, if the regulators of censorships don’t abuse their power, then system will eliminate oppressive statements from the media that could injure somebody. Furthermore, If the system of censorships had functioned properly, then government would has prevented a great deal of violence events. Whereas the system of censorships is struggling with harmless activists’ speeches, the real offenders are calmly performing on a TV and on the Internet. Thus, the main risk of censorship is situation when government begins abuse its own power. It can lead to total prohibitions and manipulation of consumer opinion. It depends on government, but, from my point of view, the laws of censorships should reduce the impact of governance over regulating the freedom of speech. In summary, even though laws of censorships have been planned as an protection from extremists’ impact, nowadays it works badly. Consequently, the system of censorships prone to support what is profitable to government and discourage what isn’t.
Nowadays, the absolute majority of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
governments
of the countries maintain the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
censorship
of mass
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
media
, and,
for instance
, consumed the Internet’s and TV’s content. In modern world, in
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
countries it can
be observed
the forbidden web-sites, videos, articles and literature.

On the one hand, information that
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
has to
be hidden
from
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
media
consumers exists.
In particular
, terroristic slogans, any types of appeals to violence and oppressive statements.
On the other hand
, the presence of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
law
, that admits even bounded opportunity to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
to regulate consumed content, gives a strong ability to impose
unnecessarily
deep and limiting
Possible spelling mistake found.
censorships
. I’m completely against established foundations. I
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
think
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
laws
regulating
Possible spelling mistake found.
censorships
, should limit the possibilities of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
to restricting
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
media’s
freedom of speech.

All things considered, the number of benefits isn’t large.
However
, if the regulators of
Possible spelling mistake found.
censorships
don’t abuse their power, then
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
system
will eliminate oppressive statements from the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
media
that could injure somebody.
Furthermore
, If the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
system
of
Possible spelling mistake found.
censorships
had functioned
properly
, then
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
would
The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: "have"
has
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
prevented
a great deal of violence
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
events
.

Whereas the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
system
of
Possible spelling mistake found.
censorships
is struggling with harmless activists’ speeches, the real offenders are
calmly
performing on a TV and on the Internet.
Thus
, the main
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
risk
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
censorship
is situation when
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
begins
abuse its
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
own
power. It can lead to total prohibitions and manipulation of consumer opinion. It depends on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
, from my point of view, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
laws
of
Possible spelling mistake found.
censorships
should
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduce
the impact of governance over regulating the freedom of speech.

In summary,
even though
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
laws
of
Possible spelling mistake found.
censorships have
been planned
as
Use "a" instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
an
protection from extremists’ impact, nowadays it works
badly
.
Consequently
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
system
of
Possible spelling mistake found.
censorships
prone to support what is profitable to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
and discourage what isn’t.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay laws regulating censorships

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
285 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts