Search
Tools
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Land should be concerned for animals, not to be used recklessly by humans. Do you agree or disagree?

Land should be concerned for animals, not to be used recklessly by humans. 2K9Mj

There is no shortage of opinion on whether land should be conserved for endangered animals or be annexed by the humans for their own use. This issue has always been sparking debate in public sphere. I believe that humans should not undertake the land from animals that are on verge to get extinct. I feel this way for two reasons which are explained in the following essay. First of all, human monopoly over earth's surface is an unethical practice, which can result into devastating consequences not only for humans but also for the planet earth. To substantiate, if humans continue to seize land from animals and retain to build industries then the amount of pollutants released by these factories will gradually increase, thereby creating an imbalance in the ecology of the earth. As a result, catastrophic events like tsunamis, global warming and even powerful cyclones accompanied by mass extinctions will cause mass destruction to our beautiful blue planet. To cite an epitome for the aforementioned point, a research study has estimated that by 2040 the temperature of the earth will get double, heralding huge environmental problems, which in turn will result into unfavourable conditions for our survival. Secondly, if animals facing the chances to get extinct actually disappear then copious of other species will suffer gradually navigating us towards our own extinction. To be more precise, our environment functions through a principle where one animal survives due to other, since some plants depend upon extrinsic factors for their reproduction similarly some animals depend on other fellow creatures either for food or other factors such as shelter. In such a scenario, if one species get extinct then a number of species that relied upon that creature will suffer adversely. To be exemplified, the extinction of the Dodo, a bird species caused one species of pine to get endangered, as the latter depended upon the bird because the seeds of that tree could not germinate without passing through the stomach of the Dodo. Hence, this example demonstrates the aforementioned point adequately. To encapsulate, land should be preserved for those animals, which are less in number rather than utilizing it for other commercial purposes because industrialization brings a plethora of environmental problems, furthermore, extinction of animals cause ecological imbalances.

There is no shortage of opinion on whether You use this word too often, consider replacing it withestatesoilterrainhomeearthcontinent
land
 should be conserved
 for endangered You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 or be annexed
 by the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbodylifemortalcharacterindividualchild
humans
 for their This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :possess
own
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
. This issue has always been sparking debate in public sphere. I believe that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbodylifemortalcharacterindividualchild
humans
 should not undertake the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withestatesoilterrainhomeearthcontinent
land
 from You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 that are on verge to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :acquire
get
 extinct. I feel this way for two reasons which are This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :interpreted
explained
 in the following essay.

This phrase is redundant. Consider using "first".First
First of all
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpersonalanimalmortal
human
 monopoly over earth's surface is an unethical practice, which can result into devastating consequences not This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 for You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbodylifemortalcharacterindividualchild
humans
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
also
 for the planet earth. To substantiate, if You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbodylifemortalcharacterindividualchild
humans
 continue to seize You use this word too often, consider replacing it withestatesoilterrainhomeearthcontinent
land
 from You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 and retain to build industries then the amount of pollutants released by these factories will gradually
 increase, thereby creating an imbalance in the ecology of the earth. As a result
, catastrophic This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :occasionshappenings
events
 like tsunamis, global warming and even powerful cyclones accompanied by mass You use this word too often, consider replacing it withannihilationeliminationdestructionobsolescence
extinctions
 will cause mass destruction to our This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :gorgeousstunning
beautiful
 blue planet. To cite an epitome for the aforementioned point, a research study has estimated that by 2040 the temperature of the earth will This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :acquire
get
 double, heralding huge environmental problems, which in turn will result into Possible spelling mistake. 'unfavourable' is British English.unfavorable
unfavourable
 conditions for our survival.

Secondly
, if You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 facing the chances to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :acquire
get
 extinct actually disappear then copious of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewalternativemore
other
 species will suffer gradually
 navigating us towards our This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :possess
own
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withannihilationeliminationdestructionobsolescence
extinction
. To be more precise, our environment functions through a principle where one You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnaturalbodily
animal
 survives due to You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewalternativemore
other
, since This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 plants depend upon extrinsic factors for their reproduction similarly
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 depend on You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewalternativemore
other
 fellow creatures either for food or You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewalternativemore
other
 factors such as shelter. In such a scenario, if one species This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :acquire
get
 extinct then a number of species that relied upon that creature will suffer adversely
. To be exemplified
, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withannihilationeliminationdestructionobsolescence
extinction
 of the Dodo, a bird species caused one species of pine to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :acquire
get
 endangered, as the latter depended upon the bird This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 the seeds of that tree could not germinate without passing through the stomach of the Dodo. Hence
, this example demonstrates the aforementioned point adequately
.

To encapsulate, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withestatesoilterrainhomeearthcontinent
land
 should be preserved
 for those You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
, which are A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.less
less in number
rather
 than utilizing it for You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewalternativemore
other
 commercial purposes This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 industrialization brings a plethora of environmental problems, furthermore
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withannihilationeliminationdestructionobsolescence
extinction
 of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 cause ecological imbalances. 