Human beings since the start of life have needed to rank individuals on a hierarchy ranking, while the concept remains unchanged the components and used criteria of ranking differ depending on the times.
In the beginning, an individual's ranking used to be based on their attributes and features like leadership, strength, intelligence, etc. But eventually, everything evolves and so did the way folk got judged upon.
Blood relations, excessive wealth, and personal origin were what decided where an individual allegedly belonged on the social pyramid. These caused separations between communities and inevitably led to pervasive discrimination among the lower-ranking by their higher-ups.
The general public was incorrectly condemned based merely on their parent's profession and was looked down on. Likewise, nowadays judging humans doesn't affect how they're treated mostly like before however, personal possessions and social ranking despite everything portray an enormous part in the way people are being looked at.
A typical illustration represents that being a prominent doctor typically attains such an elevated status and is considered to be a favorable and one of the most respected jobs in modern society. Therefore many crowds chase behind it and with similar professions like engineering just because of the social status they allegedly hold.
Times are moving and accordingly is humankind and change are inevitable.
Then again, I side more into the "a person's worth is not to be merely decided by their possessions" and judge people by their negative way of treating others.
Because no matter what job or how much a figure's wealth is if their ways of improperly handling people are terrible no one is going to respect them for it.
Human beings since the
start
of life have needed to rank individuals on a hierarchy
ranking
, while the concept remains unchanged the components and
used
criteria of
ranking
differ depending on the times.
In the beginning, an individual's
ranking
used
to
be based
on their attributes and features like leadership, strength, intelligence, etc.
But
eventually
, everything evolves and
so
did the way folk
got
judged upon.
Blood relations, excessive wealth, and personal origin were what decided where an individual allegedly belonged on the social pyramid. These caused separations between communities and
inevitably
led to pervasive discrimination among the lower-ranking by their higher-ups.
The
general public
was
incorrectly
condemned based
merely
on their parent's profession and
was looked
down on.
Likewise
, nowadays judging humans doesn't affect how they're treated
mostly
like
before
however
, personal possessions and social
ranking
despite everything portray an enormous part in the way
people
are
being looked
at.
A typical illustration represents that being a prominent doctor
typically
attains such an elevated status and
is considered
to be a favorable and one of the most respected jobs in modern society.
Therefore
many
crowds chase behind it and with similar professions like engineering
just
because
of the social status they allegedly hold.
Times are moving and
accordingly
is humankind and
change
are inevitable.
Then again, I side more into
the "a
person's worth is not to be
merely
decided by their possessions
"
and judge
people
by their
negative
way of treating others.
Because
no matter what job or how much a figure's wealth is if their ways of
improperly
handling
people
are terrible no one is going to respect them for it.