It's immensely critical to optimize the schools' curriculum in the way that benefits students the most. Henceforth, schools ought to opt the most relevant and useful subjects in order to build an impeccable program. On the countrary, it seems that there is a visible conflict over the vitality of history courses and subjects present in the area of science and technology. In my view, importance of history shall not be underestimated, in respect to the usefulness of state of the art subjects. In other words, I believe including both subjects is a key merit for a successful program.
There is a lot to debate over the crucial role of the history in our lives. History of each country is a delegation from their past, which resembles their ideology, beliefs and moral values and chronological alterations of these matters. Consequently, considering history an obsolete subject and being not familiar with it, even at the basic levels, would possibly result in pupils indigent in term of humanities. Thus, we must anticipate a society full of inept enigineers and physicians if we reject the importance of history education.
In addition, science and technology are responsible to provide life needs and answer to everyday urges. In the present era that technologies are expediating with a pace far away from our imaginations, it doesn't seem reasonable to omit these courses from schools completely. However, student are much more exhorted and curious about science and technology, which is in contrast to history. As a result, these sorts of courses might be considered as extracurricular educations in light of avid enthusiasm of today's children about technologies.
To sum up, future rocket scientists even need to be familiar with their history, which is in fact, their identity. On the other hand, learning adequate amounts of science and technology is also necessary. Due to the fact that history might be as impotant as natural sciences for instance, schools shall not set it aside.
It's
immensely
critical to optimize the schools' curriculum in the way that benefits students the most. Henceforth, schools ought to opt the most relevant and useful
subjects
in order to build an impeccable program. On the
countrary
, it seems that there is a visible conflict over the vitality of
history
courses and
subjects
present in the area of
science
and
technology
. In my view, importance of
history
shall not
be underestimated
, in respect to the usefulness of
state of the art
subjects
.
In other words
, I believe including both
subjects
is a key merit for a successful program.
There is a lot to debate over the crucial role of the
history
in our
lives
.
History
of each country is a delegation from their past, which resembles their ideology, beliefs and moral values and chronological alterations of these matters.
Consequently
, considering
history
an obsolete
subject
and being not familiar with it, even at the basic levels, would
possibly
result in pupils indigent
in term of
humanities.
Thus
, we
must
anticipate a society full of inept
enigineers
and physicians if we reject the importance of
history
education.
In addition
,
science
and
technology
are responsible to provide life needs and answer to everyday urges. In the present era that
technologies
are
expediating
with a pace far away from our imaginations, it doesn't seem reasonable to omit these courses from schools completely.
However
, student are much more exhorted and curious about
science
and
technology
, which is
in contrast
to
history
.
As a result
, these sorts of courses might
be considered
as extracurricular educations in light of avid enthusiasm of
today
's children about technologies.
To sum up, future rocket scientists even need to be familiar with their
history
, which is in fact, their identity.
On the other hand
, learning adequate amounts of
science
and
technology
is
also
necessary. Due to the fact that
history
might be as
impotant
as natural
sciences
for instance
, schools shall not set it aside.