Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

It will be better for society and individuals if driverless cars are widely used. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement?

It will be better for society and individuals if driverless cars are widely used. with the statement? p1nba

Driverless cars seem to be widely discussed these days. It appears that these cars’ usage will be better for society and individuals. I disagree with these cars usage since they are not beneficial in the present scenario due to their sensor issues and non-alignment of their traffic in roads. Coming to the individual side, the primary reason for the issues in driverless cars is certainly their sensor levels. These cars have not been fully developed to sense the surrounding objects clearly, which may pose more threats to road accidents. There is no clear empirical evidence that these cars can detect objects precisely. For instance, if the sensor of the car does not detect the opposite dimensions of the object clearly, it may lead to a collision. And there is more scope to develop these sensors efficiently before making these cars available to the public. Moreover, the present traffic system is not aligned to deal with driverless cars. These cars use an Artificial Intelligence system that is precoded to ride in simulated traffic conditions. However, these conditions are dynamic in nature and those cars may not maturely choose the correct step while driving on busy roads. Thus, it clearly demonstrates that driverless cars may not seem better for individuals. Turning to the Society side, these cars may pose threat to society as it leads to loss of jobs for many people. These smart cars may replace driver jobs, which are performed manually. Furthermore, these cars use heavy technical equipment, which makes them more expensive. In other words, these cars may attract only the affluent section of society, leading to an imbalance in ownership of these cars in society. Admittedly, it is true that Driverless cars can reduce human efforts on driving work. However, the accidental threats that these cars pose to both society and individuals have more damaging effects. In conclusion, although driverless cars reduce human intervention, these cars may seem a threat in present days due to their sensor and traffic management issues. I, therefore, tend to disagree that driverless cars will replace the present driving system.

Driverless You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwagonvanautobusridemachine
cars
 seem to be widely
 discussed these days. It appears that these You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwagonvanautobusridemachine
cars’
 usage will be better for You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcompanyhumanitycommunitynationculturecivilization
society
 and individuals. I disagree with these Apostrophe might be missing. Did you mean "cars'" or "car's"?cars'car's
cars
 usage since they are not beneficial in the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcurrent
present
 scenario due to their sensor issues and non-alignment of their You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtransportationshipmentservicetravelinfluxgridlock
traffic
 in roads.

Coming to the individual side, the primary reason for the issues in driverless You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwagonvanautobusridemachine
cars
 is certainly
 their sensor levels. These You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwagonvanautobusridemachine
cars
 have not been fully
 developed to sense the surrounding objects clearly
, which may pose more You use this word too often, consider replacing it withperilriskblackmailhazardintimidationmenace
threats
 to road accidents. There is no This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :apparent
clear
 empirical evidence that these You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwagonvanautobusridemachine
cars
 can detect objects precisely
. For instance
, if the sensor of the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwagonvanautobusridemachine
car
 does not detect the opposite dimensions of the object clearly
, it may lead to a collision. And there is more scope to develop these sensors efficiently
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:previouslyprior to
before
 making these You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwagonvanautobusridemachine
cars
 available to the public. Moreover
, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcurrent
present
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtransportationshipmentservicetravelinfluxgridlock
traffic
 system is not aligned to deal with driverless You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwagonvanautobusridemachine
cars
. These You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwagonvanautobusridemachine
cars
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
 an Artificial Intelligence system that is
Possible spelling mistake found.preceded
precoded
 to ride in simulated You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtransportationshipmentservicetravelinfluxgridlock
traffic
 conditions. However
, these conditions are dynamic in nature and those You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwagonvanautobusridemachine
cars
 may not maturely
 choose the correct step while driving on busy roads. Thus
, it clearly
 demonstrates that driverless You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwagonvanautobusridemachine
cars
 may not seem better for individuals.

Turning to the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcompanyhumanitycommunitynationculturecivilization
Society
 side, these You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwagonvanautobusridemachine
cars
 may pose You use this word too often, consider replacing it withperilriskblackmailhazardintimidationmenace
threat
 to You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcompanyhumanitycommunitynationculturecivilization
society
 as it leads to loss of jobs for This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
. These smart You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwagonvanautobusridemachine
cars
 may replace driver jobs, which are performed
manually
. Furthermore
, these You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwagonvanautobusridemachine
cars
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
 heavy technical equipment, which This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :createsconstructsmanufacturesproduces
makes
 them more expensive. In other words
, these You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwagonvanautobusridemachine
cars
 may attract This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 the affluent section of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcompanyhumanitycommunitynationculturecivilization
society
, leading to an imbalance in ownership of these You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwagonvanautobusridemachine
cars
 in society.

Admittedly
, it is true that Driverless You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwagonvanautobusridemachine
cars
 can This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :alleviate
reduce
 human efforts on driving work. However
, the accidental You use this word too often, consider replacing it withperilriskblackmailhazardintimidationmenace
threats
 that these You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwagonvanautobusridemachine
cars
 pose to both You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcompanyhumanitycommunitynationculturecivilization
society
 and individuals have more damaging effects.

In conclusion
, although driverless You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwagonvanautobusridemachine
cars
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :alleviate
reduce
 human intervention, these You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwagonvanautobusridemachine
cars
 may seem a You use this word too often, consider replacing it withperilriskblackmailhazardintimidationmenace
threat
 in You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcurrent
present
 days due to their sensor and You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtransportationshipmentservicetravelinfluxgridlock
traffic
 management issues. I, therefore
, tend to disagree that driverless You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwagonvanautobusridemachine
cars
 will replace the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcurrent
present
 driving system. 