It is true that the prevalence of technology leads to devastating consequences for the environment. While some individuals claim that a simpler lifestyle can solve these issues, I have a conviction that people still can utilize technology to address such problems.
On the one hand, in order to tackle the destructivel environmental effects caused by technological advancements, human beings should accept a simpler lifestyle. Nowadays, by the advent of cars that consume fossil fuel, the commutation of humans becomes more convenient; however, such private transport emits a substantial amount of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, which has proven to be the main culprit of global warming and ozone depletion. Therefore, in order to alleviate environmental degradation, people should change their lifestyle into a simpler one by using environmentally friendly transportation such as bicycle. Not only does it preserve the environment intact, but it can also be used as a way of exercise to strengthen people’s health condition.
On the other hand, I side with those who believe that the utilization of technology can still resolve environmental problems. A more favorable solution is to invest in greener technologies that can mitigate much of the environmental deterioration already done. Scientists have already started working on them and constituted several considerable accomplishments. For example, it is the invention of electric trains. They induce much less air pollution than diesel engines. The cars running on electricity instead of fossil fuel are another auspicious technology that can tackle environmental degradation. Likewise, greener energy sources like wind and solar may soon replace conventional energy sources like coal.
In conclusion, I would argue that it is unnecessary for human beings to change their lifestyle into a simpler one, as they can make use of technological advancements to tackle the environmental issues.
It is true that the prevalence of
technology
leads to devastating consequences for the environment. While
some
individuals claim that a
simpler
lifestyle
can solve these issues, I have a conviction that
people
still
can utilize
technology
to address such problems.
On the one hand, in order to tackle the
destructivel
environmental
effects caused by technological advancements, human beings should accept a
simpler
lifestyle
. Nowadays, by the advent of cars that consume fossil fuel, the commutation of humans becomes more convenient;
however
, such private transport emits a substantial amount of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, which has proven to be the main culprit of global warming and ozone depletion.
Therefore
, in order to alleviate
environmental
degradation,
people
should
change
their
lifestyle
into a
simpler
one by using
environmentally
friendly transportation such as bicycle. Not
only
does it preserve the environment intact,
but
it can
also
be
used
as a way of exercise to strengthen
people
’s health condition.
On the other hand
, I side with those who believe that the utilization of
technology
can
still
resolve
environmental
problems. A more favorable solution is to invest in greener
technologies
that can mitigate much of the
environmental
deterioration already done. Scientists have already
started
working on them and constituted several considerable accomplishments.
For example
, it is the invention of electric trains. They induce much less air pollution than diesel engines. The cars running on electricity
instead
of fossil fuel are another auspicious
technology
that can tackle
environmental
degradation.
Likewise
, greener energy sources like wind and solar may
soon
replace conventional energy sources like coal.
In conclusion
, I would argue that it is unnecessary for human beings to
change
their
lifestyle
into a
simpler
one, as they can
make
use
of technological advancements to tackle the
environmental
issues.