It is thought that mode of mass transport should be invested by the authorities, while others think that the government should allocate money for essential sectors (e. g. cost, environment). I exclaim that they should take priority to form of transport.
On the one hand, there are many factors contributing to investing in many important sectors from the government funding. If the authorities allocate on the social fields such as cost of living, environment. . . The local people will have a better lifestyle, which raises the residences' awareness. Followed a certain survey, in recent years, the rate of poverty of Vietnamese people varies greatly. Secondly, by investing money in infrastructure conditions, they can reduce the excessive level of emission for air pollution and a vital key is to avoid health hazards.
Nevertheless, there are many compelling reasons why some people think that allocation the national budgets for a faster form of transport is a better option to improve connectivity. If the commuters prefer going by public transport to using the private vehicles, this may lead to a significant decrease in traffic congestion and environmental pollution. Secondly, faster public transport services allow people to reach the workplaces in a faster and easy way, which brings about many benefits for commuters. To be more specific, they can save significantly more time on commuting to and from work, having time for resting, relaxing, and revitalizing themselves for the following day. Also apparent is the fact that it makes a contribution to improving the productivity of many important sectors.
To summarize, while it is obvious that the public money should be invested in other essential sectors in order to improve the standard of living and meeting the need for public accommodation. In stark contrast, however, the government should spend much more money on speedy vehicles for a shift towards environmental protection.
It is
thought
that mode of mass
transport
should
be invested
by the authorities, while others
think
that the
government
should allocate
money
for essential sectors (
e. g.
cost, environment). I exclaim that they should take priority to form of transport.
On the one hand, there are
many
factors contributing to investing in
many
important
sectors from the
government
funding. If the authorities allocate on the social fields such as cost of living, environment.
.
.
The local
people
will have a better lifestyle, which raises the residences' awareness. Followed a certain survey, in recent years, the rate of poverty of Vietnamese
people
varies
greatly
.
Secondly
, by investing
money
in infrastructure conditions, they can
reduce
the excessive level of emission for air pollution and a vital key is to avoid health hazards.
Nevertheless
, there are
many
compelling reasons why
some
people
think
that allocation the national budgets for a faster form of
transport
is a better option to
improve
connectivity. If the commuters prefer going by
public
transport
to using the private vehicles, this may lead to a significant decrease in traffic congestion and environmental pollution.
Secondly
, faster
public
transport
services
allow
people
to reach the workplaces in a faster and easy way, which brings about
many
benefits for commuters. To be more specific, they can save
significantly
more time on commuting to and from work, having time for resting, relaxing, and revitalizing themselves for the following day.
Also
apparent is the fact that it
makes
a contribution to improving the productivity of
many
important
sectors.
To summarize
, while it is obvious that the
public
money
should
be invested
in other essential sectors in order to
improve
the standard of living and meeting the need for
public
accommodation. In stark contrast,
however
, the
government
should spend much more
money
on speedy vehicles for a shift towards environmental protection.