Nowadays, people have many views whether are consumed vast amounts of money on projects to save the environment or other issues by the government. I think although expending too much money should solve other problems in the country is necessary, also the spending the vast amount of money ought to prevent habitat loss for animals
On the one hand, the state of the country ought to contribute money to another issue of the land, which means they prevent poverty and should increase the living standards of society. For example, if the government consumes money to develop new job centers, they can also prevent starvation in the motherland. Therefore, everyone has an opportunity to get educations without any tuition fee, and all these processes provide the future of offspring.
On the other hand, the state of the country should contribute a certain amount of money to various types of projects to prevent habitat loss or other environmental issues because all problems are related to the commercial purposes of the government. Furthermore, logging and deforestation principally increase because the authorities build new industrial factories, and these new manufactural constructions mainly influence the wildlife. For instance, according to the researches, the construction of a new factory is caused by cutting down 1, 000 trees in the woodland during one week of administration. Consequently, the authorities make an effort to create modern plans for saving the environment because all nature problems should impact our generations in the future.
In conclusion, I believe even though crowds have various opinions about these projects, the authorities keep the balance between the environment and society, and these projects provide an unstressful life for crowds.
Nowadays,
people
have
many
views whether
are consumed
vast amounts of
money
on
projects
to save the environment or
other
issues by the
government
. I
think
although expending too much
money
should solve
other
problems in the country is necessary,
also
the spending the vast amount of
money
ought to
prevent
habitat loss for
animals
On the one hand, the state of the country ought to contribute
money
to another issue of the land, which means they
prevent
poverty and should increase the living standards of society.
For example
, if the
government
consumes
money
to develop
new
job centers, they can
also
prevent
starvation in the motherland.
Therefore
, everyone has an opportunity to
get
educations without any tuition fee, and all these processes provide the future of offspring.
On the
other
hand, the state of the country should contribute a certain amount of
money
to various types of
projects
to
prevent
habitat loss or
other
environmental issues
because
all problems
are related
to the commercial purposes of the
government
.
Furthermore
, logging and deforestation
principally
increase
because
the authorities build
new
industrial factories, and these
new
manufactural
constructions
mainly
influence the wildlife.
For instance
, according to the researches, the construction of a
new
factory
is caused
by cutting down 1, 000 trees in the woodland during one week of administration.
Consequently
, the authorities
make
an effort to create modern plans for saving the environment
because
all nature problems should impact our generations in the future.
In conclusion
, I believe
even though
crowds have various opinions about these
projects
, the authorities
keep
the balance between the environment and society, and these
projects
provide an
unstressful
life for crowds.