As technology has developed, people can now travel to remote natural areas. While
there are some advantages of this trend, I would argue that its disadvantages are more
significant.
On the one hand, visiting isolated natural places has some benefits. Firstly, this is a
newer and more interesting type of travelling. Since going to other cities or countries
has been too common for most people, it might be more exciting for them to explore new places such as the South Pole or the Amazon rainforest. This gives them valuable experiences and unforgettable memories. Secondly, when visiting remote areas, people, especially scientists, might acquire more knowledge about the natural habitat. For example, when coming to the North Pole, scientists can learn about the life of polar
bears which live far away from humans.
On the other hand, I believe there are great drawbacks of this development. The first
one is that travelling to remote natural areas can be risky if the travellers are not
sufficiently prepared. For instance, the temperature at the South Pole is usually very
low, which adversely affects people's health. Travelling to forests can also be dangerous as people have to face the risk of being attacked by wild animals. Also, since visiting isolated places often requires a large amount of investment in researching and ensuring
the safety of travellers, the costs of travelling tend to be high. Therefore, it seems like
only scientists and rich people can afford this activity, and this development is likely to benefit only a small group of individuals.
In conclusion, I believe the disadvantages of people being able to travel to remote areas
outweigh its advantages, and this is a negative development.
As technology has developed,
people
can
now
travel to
remote
natural
areas. While
there are
some
advantages of this trend, I would argue that its disadvantages are more
significant
.
On the one hand, visiting isolated
natural
places has
some
benefits.
Firstly
, this is a
newer
and more interesting type of
travelling
. Since going to other cities or
countries
has
been too common for most
people
, it might be more exciting for them to explore new places such as the South Pole or the Amazon rainforest. This gives them valuable experiences and unforgettable memories.
Secondly
, when visiting
remote
areas,
people
,
especially
scientists, might acquire more knowledge about the
natural
habitat.
For example
, when coming to the North Pole, scientists can learn about the life of polar
bears which
live
far away from humans.
On the other hand
, I believe there are great drawbacks of this development. The
first
one is that
travelling
to
remote
natural
areas can be risky if the
travellers
are not
sufficiently
prepared.
For instance
, the temperature at the South Pole is
usually
very
low
, which
adversely
affects
people
's health.
Travelling
to forests can
also
be
dangerous
as
people
have to
face the
risk
of
being attacked
by wild animals.
Also
, since visiting isolated places
often
requires a large amount of investment in researching and ensuring
the
safety of
travellers
, the costs of
travelling
tend to be high.
Therefore
, it seems like
only
scientists and rich
people
can afford this activity, and this development is likely to benefit
only
a
small
group of individuals.
In conclusion
, I believe the disadvantages of
people
being able to travel to
remote
areas
outweigh
its advantages, and this is a
negative
development.