It is true that history should be introduced into the curriculum as a compulsory subject. While I agree that local history plays a leading role in the educational program, I also believe that world history is a better choice of subject for students.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why students should focus on local history. Firstly, it is easier for students to learn about the history of where they live. Local history usually attaches to the activities in students' daily life. Take the North and South Viet Nam as an example. As the southerners have long been inhabiting a fertile region, they are very liberal with their money and often overspend. In contrast, the northerners usually have rigorous living standards and strict discipline since their history is connected with Confucian. Secondly, knowledge of ancestors is essential for students. For example, in Ha Noi, students are taught history about Dong Da mound where the national hero, Quang Trung, fought against the enemy to protect the country. This could pave the way for students to aware of their ancestors' contributions.
On the other hand, it is wrong to reflect the argument in favor of the importance of world history educating. Firstly, general knowledge about worldwide history can equip students for their careers. Students need to gain a deep understanding of historical information about their chosen field to achieve long-term success. Secondly, world history exerts a strong influence on each country's history. This leads to learning about world history is an effective way to deeply understand local history.
In conclusion, it is ludicrous to compare the local history and world history as they are equally important. 
It is true that  
history
 should  
be introduced
 into the curriculum as a compulsory subject. While I  
agree
 that  
local
  history
 plays a leading role in the educational program, I  
also
 believe that  
world
  history
 is a better choice of subject for students.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why  
students
 should focus on  
local
  history
.  
Firstly
, it is easier for  
students
 to learn about the  
history
 of where they  
live
.  
Local
  history
  usually
 attaches to the activities in students' daily life. Take the North and South  
Viet
 Nam as an example. As the southerners have long been inhabiting a fertile region, they are  
very
 liberal with their money and  
often
 overspend.  
In contrast
, the northerners  
usually
 have rigorous living standards and strict discipline since their  
history
  is connected
 with Confucian.  
Secondly
, knowledge of ancestors is essential for  
students
.  
For example
, in Ha  
Noi
,  
students
  are taught
  history
 about Dong  
Da
 mound where the national hero,  
Quang
  Trung
, fought against the enemy to protect the country. This could pave the way for  
students
 to aware of their ancestors' contributions. 
On the other hand
, it is  
wrong
 to reflect the argument in favor of the importance of  
world
  history
 educating.  
Firstly
, general knowledge about worldwide  
history
 can equip  
students
 for their careers.  
Students
 need to gain a deep understanding of historical information about their chosen field to achieve long-term success.  
Secondly
,  
world
  history
 exerts a strong influence on each country's  
history
. This leads to learning about  
world
  history
 is an effective way to  
deeply
 understand  
local
 history. 
In conclusion
, it is ludicrous to compare the  
local
  history
 and  
world
  history
 as they are  
equally
  important
. 
12Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
32Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
5Mistakes