It is true that history should be introduced into the curriculum as a compulsory subject. While I agree that local history plays a leading role in the educational program, I also believe that world history is a better choice of subject for students.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why students should focus on local history. Firstly, it is easier for students to learn about the history of where they live. Local history usually attaches to the activities in students' daily life. Take the North and South Viet Nam as an example. As the southerners have long been inhabiting a fertile region, they are very liberal with their money and often overspend. In contrast, the northerners usually have rigorous living standards and strict discipline since their history is connected with Confucian. Secondly, knowledge of ancestors is essential for students. For example, in Ha Noi, students are taught history about Dong Da mound where the national hero, Quang Trung, fought against the enemy to protect the country. This could pave the way for students to aware of their ancestors' contributions.
On the other hand, it is wrong to reflect the argument in favor of the importance of world history educating. Firstly, general knowledge about worldwide history can equip students for their careers. Students need to gain a deep understanding of historical information about their chosen field to achieve long-term success. Secondly, world history exerts a strong influence on each country's history. This leads to learning about world history is an effective way to deeply understand local history.
In conclusion, it is ludicrous to compare the local history and world history as they are equally important.
It is true that
history
should
be introduced
into the curriculum as a compulsory subject. While I
agree
that
local
history
plays a leading role in the educational program, I
also
believe that
world
history
is a better choice of subject for students.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why
students
should focus on
local
history
.
Firstly
, it is easier for
students
to learn about the
history
of where they
live
.
Local
history
usually
attaches to the activities in students' daily life. Take the North and South
Viet
Nam as an example. As the southerners have long been inhabiting a fertile region, they are
very
liberal with their money and
often
overspend.
In contrast
, the northerners
usually
have rigorous living standards and strict discipline since their
history
is connected
with Confucian.
Secondly
, knowledge of ancestors is essential for
students
.
For example
, in Ha
Noi
,
students
are taught
history
about Dong
Da
mound where the national hero,
Quang
Trung
, fought against the enemy to protect the country. This could pave the way for
students
to aware of their ancestors' contributions.
On the other hand
, it is
wrong
to reflect the argument in favor of the importance of
world
history
educating.
Firstly
, general knowledge about worldwide
history
can equip
students
for their careers.
Students
need to gain a deep understanding of historical information about their chosen field to achieve long-term success.
Secondly
,
world
history
exerts a strong influence on each country's
history
. This leads to learning about
world
history
is an effective way to
deeply
understand
local
history.
In conclusion
, it is ludicrous to compare the
local
history
and
world
history
as they are
equally
important
.
12Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
32Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
5Mistakes