It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree? v.4
It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history.  v. 4
Some people believe that it is very crucial for young kids to know about the local happenings. However, other people give importance to global history as it is considered more useful. Each and every place have their own unique history. In my opinion, I agree with the statement that local history should be taught to school chilnd can be lost over the period of time, to prevent such miss happenings it is necessary to encourage children to seek knowledge of the place. For example, some of the tribes lost their history and the origin, and know they don’t hadren. I will propose possible illustration for the same.
To begin with, every place has its own series of events, and to preserve it, children should learn the history of the place. History can be altered ave a promising tale to tell. In all, History keeps the authenticity of the place intact.
Secondly, it necessitates emotional attachment to the land, this often help children to grow stronger. In other words, it entails a sense of patriotism for the place and binds the soul with the soil. For instance, People tend to die to protect their unique culture and heritage. They have pride in their history, and they want to pass theses values to their children.
To conclude, history is more than a factual representation of the occurrence of events, it is connected emotionally to peoples lives. Therefore, it is essential for children to know about such events which changed their ancestor’s lives. It is the responsibility of the parent and the government to fetch these happening in children’s school books. 
 Some
  people
 believe that it is  
very
 crucial for young kids to know about the local happenings.  
However
, other  
people
 give importance to global  
history
 as it  
is considered
 more useful. Each and every  
place
 have their  
own
 unique  
history
. In my opinion, I  
agree
 with the statement that local  
history
 should  
be taught
 to school  
chilnd
 can  
be lost
 over the period of time, to  
prevent
 such miss happenings it is necessary to encourage  
children
 to seek knowledge of the  
place
.  
For example
,  
some of the
 tribes lost their  
history
 and the origin, and  
know
 they don’t  
hadren
. I will propose possible illustration for the same.
To  
begin
 with, every  
place
 has its  
own
 series of  
events
, and to preserve it,  
children
 should learn the  
history
 of the  
place
.  
History
 can  
be altered
 ave a promising tale to  
tell
. In all,  
History
  keeps
 the authenticity of the  
place
 intact. 
Secondly
, it necessitates emotional attachment to the land, this  
often
  help
  children
 to grow stronger.  
In other words
, it entails a sense of patriotism for the  
place
 and binds the soul with the soil.  
For instance
,  
People
 tend to  
die
 to protect their unique culture and heritage. They have pride in their  
history
, and they want to pass  
theses
 values to their children. 
To conclude
,  
history
 is more than a factual representation of the occurrence of  
events
, it  
is connected
  emotionally
 to  
peoples
  lives
.  
Therefore
, it is essential for  
children
 to know about such  
events
 which  
changed
 their ancestor’s  
lives
. It is the responsibility of the parent and the  
government
 to fetch these happening in  
children’s
 school books. 
 13Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
24Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
5Mistakes