History broadens the horizon of one' s knowledge about the past happenings. It has been controversial whether learning about the local history is of greater significance for juveniles than knowing about the world history or not. Here, i would like to discord with the given statement.
There are multifarious points to shore up my view. First and foremost, the knowledge of world history highlights the international scenario to clear the prospectives of someone at international level. To demonstrate, unlike local history, one can get informed about the policies of past leaders or distinct countries in terms of social, commercial and political matters by learning the world history. Apart from it, sacrifices of martyrs and examples of some most influential leaders of the world could be a source of inspiration and bravery. Therefore, one who gets informed about the history of entire globe finds it easy to settle himself at international level compare to an individual with the knowledge of only local history.
Further emphasizing on my point of view, the world history also portrays the world wars of former times with the comprehensive description of causes, effects and consequences. To be specific, knowing about the destruction of two major cities Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan can aware a person about the heart rendering results, exploitation and cruelty towards the mankind during world wars. Hence, having familiarity with the world history can make an individual better thinker and planner. On the contrary, others have contrasting views.
They think that being informed about local history makes a child respectful towards cultural, historic and ancestral values of his native country. More significantly, they can think of the sacrifices of martyrs and bravery shown by the leaders of their home country. Thus, teaching local history is worthwhile to install patriotic spirit among adolescents. On the flip side, world events may not have close association or direct linkage with their personal lives. Consequently, local history deserves more priority than global past.
To recapitulate, undeniably, the importance of local history can never be underestimated; however, i still believe in this era of globalization, boundaries between nations are no longer of that importance. Therefore, providing lessons of world history is the need of an hour in the schools.
History
broadens the horizon of
one&
#039; s knowledge about the past happenings. It has been controversial whether learning about the
local
history
is of greater significance for juveniles than knowing about the
world
history
or not. Here,
i
would like to discord with the
given
statement.
There are multifarious points to shore up my view.
First
and foremost, the knowledge of
world
history
highlights the international scenario to
clear
the
prospectives
of someone at international level. To demonstrate, unlike
local
history
, one can
get
informed about the policies of past leaders or distinct countries in terms of social, commercial and political matters by learning the
world
history
. Apart from it, sacrifices of martyrs and examples of
some
most influential leaders of the
world
could be a source of inspiration and bravery.
Therefore
, one who
gets
informed about the
history
of entire globe finds it easy to settle himself at international level compare to an individual with the knowledge of
only
local
history.
Further
emphasizing on my point of view, the
world
history
also
portrays the
world
wars of former times with the comprehensive description of causes, effects and consequences. To be specific, knowing about the destruction of two major cities Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan can aware a person about the heart rendering results, exploitation and cruelty towards the mankind during
world
wars.
Hence
, having familiarity with the
world
history
can
make
an individual better thinker and planner.
On the contrary
, others have contrasting views.
They
think
that
being informed
about
local
history
makes
a child respectful towards cultural, historic and ancestral values of his native country. More
significantly
, they can
think
of the sacrifices of martyrs and bravery shown by the leaders of their home country.
Thus
, teaching
local
history
is worthwhile to install patriotic spirit among adolescents. On the flip side,
world
events
may not have close association or direct linkage with their personal
lives
.
Consequently
,
local
history
deserves more priority than global past.
To recapitulate,
undeniably
, the importance of
local
history
can never
be underestimated
;
however
,
i
still
believe in this era of globalization, boundaries between nations are no longer of that importance.
Therefore
, providing lessons of
world
history
is the need of an hour in the schools.