Search
Tools
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

It is important for all towns and cities to have large public places

It is important for all towns and cities to have large public places 0pBn3

There is an argument whether it is necessary for every town or city to spend vast areas for constructing communal places such as squares and parks. Nevertheless, I totally disagree with this opinion for two reasons. First of all, these constructions require cavernous plots of land in the towns or cities. For this reason, building such enormous places like these is such a waste of land and it is definitely needless. We can still have parks and squares sited in the cities but with small areas. Otherwise, there are a lot more prominent areas and buildings which the government needs to increase in size rather than entertaining places. For example, school campuses, hospitals, residential estates, etc. Second, the construction costs will be sky-high, and again, this is another way of splurging. The government has way more social issues which need to be laid out instead of building luxuries. Especially, raising funds for charity, renovating derelict facilities or helding some scholarship programmes in order to encourage students with their studies. Some people may think that having a big park or a big square may be a proper place for doing workout exercises such as walking or running. This may be helpful for exercising, but only on sunny days. Nevertheless, it may be impossible to workout in the park on rainy days. Instead, the resident can go to gym centers every day without the interference of the weather. In conclusion, it appears to me that it is unnecessary for urban areas to have such mass public places.

There is an argument whether it is necessary for every town or city to spend vast You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfieldoperationrangespace
areas
 for constructing communal You use this word too often, consider replacing it withneighborhoodpointhousesitecommunityseat
places
 such as squares and You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlawnsquaregardenestateplazaplace
parks
. Nevertheless
, I totally
 disagree with this opinion for two reasons.

This phrase is redundant. Consider using "first".First
First of all
, these constructions require cavernous plots of land in the towns or cities. For this reason
, building such enormous You use this word too often, consider replacing it withneighborhoodpointhousesitecommunityseat
places
 like these is such a waste of land and it is definitely needless. We can still
 have You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlawnsquaregardenestateplazaplace
parks
 and squares sited in the cities This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 with This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:tiny
small
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfieldoperationrangespace
areas
. Otherwise
, there are a lot more prominent You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfieldoperationrangespace
areas
 and buildings which the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :national authoritypublic authority
government
 needs to increase in size rather
 than entertaining You use this word too often, consider replacing it withneighborhoodpointhousesitecommunityseat
places
. For example
, school campuses, hospitals, residential estates, etc.

Second, the construction costs will be sky-high, and again, this is another way of splurging. The This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :national authoritypublic authority
government
 has way more social issues which need to be laid
 out instead
 of building luxuries. Especially
, raising funds for charity, renovating derelict facilities or Possible spelling mistake found.helpingholdingheadingweldingherdinggelding
helding
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 scholarship Possible spelling mistake. 'programmes' is British English.programs
programmes
 in order to encourage students with their studies.

This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
Some
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 may This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reckonassumebelieveconsider
think
 that having a This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:hugeenormousgiganticvast
big
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlawnsquaregardenestateplazaplace
park
 or a This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:hugeenormousgiganticvast
big
 square may be a proper You use this word too often, consider replacing it withneighborhoodpointhousesitecommunityseat
place
 for doing workout exercises such as walking or running. This may be helpful for exercising, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 on sunny days. Nevertheless
, it may be impossible to workout in the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlawnsquaregardenestateplazaplace
park
 on rainy days. Instead
, the resident can go to gym centers every day without the interference of the weather.

In conclusion
, it appears to me that it is unnecessary for urban You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfieldoperationrangespace
areas
 to have such mass public You use this word too often, consider replacing it withneighborhoodpointhousesitecommunityseat
places
. 