It is true that large public facilities such as parks and open spaces have beneficial effects on citizens who live in the Metropolis. I am partially agree with the statement that every cities have squares and parks are essential.
On the one hand, there are Several advantages to have open area and parks in the metropolitan. Firstly, parks provide the greenery to the citizens which is healthy for them and reduce the air pollution because there are a lot of trees and green grass. People could get the fresh air in their regular exercise and it will increase the health of the local public would suffer from obesity and asthma diseases. Beside that, the open spaces also assential. Individual can arrange the musical related program, flower show and so on. It surges the local economy and people spend their time to do these activities.
Nevertheless, I believe that it is difficult for all cities can invest in public places due to the lack of placement government should invest to build a new accommendation or building instead of parks and open spaces because the Cities have population and it provide the sufficient place for the living life to the local public. Sencondly, the costs of the renovation and build a new building is very high. However, every time it is not possible to approve the this type of project. It takes a lot of money and it may be create a burden on poor countries so, where should be education, health care and other facilities might build rather than public areas.
To conclude, It is fact that every cities has a parks and open places is important for exercise and economically but, In opinion some time it is beneficial while some time it is burden on the poor countries who face a lot of financial difficulty.
It is true that large
public
facilities such as
parks
and
open
spaces have beneficial effects on citizens who
live
in the Metropolis. I am
partially
agree
with the statement that every
cities
have squares and
parks
are essential.
On the one hand, there are Several advantages to have
open
area and
parks
in the metropolitan.
Firstly
,
parks
provide the greenery to the citizens which is healthy for them and
reduce
the air pollution
because
there are
a lot of
trees and green grass.
People
could
get
the fresh air in their regular exercise and it will increase the health of the local
public
would suffer from obesity and asthma diseases. Beside that, the
open
spaces
also
assential
. Individual can arrange the musical related program, flower
show
and
so
on. It surges the local economy and
people
spend their
time
to do these activities.
Nevertheless
, I believe that it is difficult for all
cities
can invest in
public
places due to the lack of placement
government
should invest to build a new
accommendation
or building
instead
of
parks
and
open
spaces
because
the
Cities
have population and it
provide
the sufficient place for the living life to the local
public
.
Sencondly
, the costs of the renovation and build a new building is
very
high.
However
, every
time
it is not possible to approve
the this
type of project. It takes
a lot of
money and it
may be
create
a burden on poor countries
so
, where should be education, health care and other facilities might build
rather
than
public
areas.
To conclude
, It is fact that every
cities
has a
parks
and
open
places is
important
for exercise and
economically
but
, In opinion
some
time
it is beneficial while
some
time
it is burden on the poor countries who face
a lot of
financial difficulty.