It is difficult to conceive a sustainable economic growth without a clean and healthy living condition for people. For this reason, many suggest a new legislation on household waste recycling as the only way to protect the living environment. I partly agree with this statement. On the one hand, I concur that a law on waste recycling is a promising approach to the problems of waste from households. It is true that when a bill is adopted and made into a law, people undoubtedly pay more attention to it and take it with more serious consideration. If they know that they can be fined, punished or even imprisoned for not obeying recycling laws, they will certainly abide by the laws and take more responsibility for classifying the waste from their homes. This will gradually form a good habit of protecting the surrounding environment among the population. For this reason, more waste from home can be recycled, contributing to a cleaner environment. On the other hand, I do not agree that this is the only measure to increase recycling because education can be equally or even more effective to solve the problem of household waste. For example, governments should have well-trained teachers impart the knowledge of how to properly recycle household waste to students. Children who receive this knowledge can recycle with a higher level of effectiveness and success than those who do not. Another reason why I do not agree with this new law is that this policy is apparently impractical to low-income families who are already struggling with many problems in their life. A law on treating waste from their homes just places a heavier burden and greater anxiety on them. In conclusion, the introduction of a new law on treating waste from homes can be an effective measure to some extent, but this would certainly not be the only way and not a feasible measure to unstable income families.
It is difficult to conceive a sustainable economic growth without a clean and healthy living condition for
people
.
For this reason
,
many
suggest a new legislation on
household
waste
recycling
as the
only
way to protect the living environment. I partly
agree
with this statement. On the one hand, I concur that a
law
on
waste
recycling
is a promising approach to the problems of
waste
from
households
. It is true that when a bill
is adopted
and made into a
law
,
people
undoubtedly
pay more attention to it and take it with more serious consideration. If they know that they can
be fined
, punished or even imprisoned for not obeying
recycling
laws
, they will
certainly
abide by the
laws
and take more responsibility for classifying the
waste
from their
homes
. This will
gradually
form a
good
habit of protecting the surrounding environment among the population.
For this reason
, more
waste
from home can
be recycled
, contributing to a cleaner environment.
On the other hand
, I do not
agree
that this is the
only
measure to increase
recycling
because
education can be
equally
or even more effective to solve the problem of
household
waste
.
For example
,
governments
should have well-trained teachers impart the knowledge of how to
properly
recycle
household
waste
to students. Children who receive this knowledge can recycle with a higher level of effectiveness and success than those who do not. Another reason why I do not
agree
with this new
law
is that this policy is
apparently
impractical to low-income families who are already struggling with
many
problems in their life. A
law
on treating
waste
from their
homes
just
places a heavier burden and greater anxiety on them.
In conclusion
, the introduction of a new
law
on treating
waste
from
homes
can be an effective measure to
some
extent,
but
this would
certainly
not be the
only
way and not a feasible measure to unstable income families.