In the modern world, there has been an accelerating trend of people eating unhealthy food, posing a wide range of detrimental threats to their health. While some people corsider education as anineffective measure to resolve the problem. I would contend that this practice would serve as a definitely worlable solution to tackling such a problem.
There is a common belief that echration would not be an effective method of deterring people from consurning a large amount of junk food. Supporters of this view might argue that the modern living style is the root of this issue, which would not be efficiently addressed by education. For example, there are many intellectual officers in favour of fast food due to its convenience and portable manner. Despite of their profound nutrition-related knowledge and awareness, these busy consumers opt for fast food for the sake of time saving. Besides, there are other efficiendis turbingjunk food consumption. For instance, the government could impose higher taxation schemes on junk food. By raising fast food prices, such a strict legal action could vield immediate and widespread effects on consumer behavior, thus bringing forth a quicker decline in junk food consumption compared to education.
However, I would strongly endorse education as an effective key to the junk food overconsumption problem
The primary reason is that an appropriate education would efficiently heighten eaters' awareness which may act
as a deterrent to people's opting for unhealthy food. For instance, once people gain insightful knowledge and awareness about life-threatering cancers and diseases caused by overeating fast food, they would be more likely to put an end to such a hamil eating habit. Another supporting reason is that nutrition education programs compared to other measures such as imposing higher taxes, could result in more sustainable awareness and behavior change among people from all walks of life, especially children and adolescents. These beneficiaries will ciliate a lifetime habit of refraining from junk food or restricting such intale.
To sum up, although there are reasonable arguments against education, I firmly believe that educational measures would significantly mitigatejurik food consumption and deter the problem from being exacerbated further. 
In the modern world, there has been an accelerating trend of  
people
 eating unhealthy  
food
, posing a wide range of detrimental threats to their health. While  
some
  people
  corsider
  education
 as  
anineffective
 measure to resolve the problem. I would contend that this practice would serve as a definitely  
worlable
 solution to tackling such a problem.
There is a common belief that  
echration
 would not be an effective method of deterring  
people
 from  
consurning
 a large amount of  
junk
  food
. Supporters of this view might argue that the modern living style is the root of this issue, which would not be  
efficiently
 addressed by  
education
.  
For example
, there are  
many
 intellectual officers in  
favour
 of  
fast
  food
 due to its convenience and portable manner.  
Despite of
 their profound nutrition-related knowledge and  
awareness
, these busy consumers opt for  
fast
  food
 for the sake of time saving.  
Besides
, there are other  
efficiendis
  turbingjunk
  food
 consumption.  
For instance
, the  
government
 could impose higher taxation schemes on  
junk
  food
. By raising  
fast
  food
 prices, such a strict legal action could  
vield
 immediate and widespread effects on consumer behavior,  
thus
 bringing forth a quicker decline in  
junk
  food
 consumption compared to education. 
However
, I would  
strongly
 endorse  
education
 as an effective key to the  
junk
  food
 overconsumption problem
The primary reason is that an appropriate  
education
 would  
efficiently
 heighten eaters'  
awareness
 which may act
as a deterrent to  
people
's opting for unhealthy  
food
.  
For instance
, once  
people
 gain insightful knowledge and  
awareness
 about  
life-threatering
 cancers and diseases caused by overeating  
fast
  food
, they would be more likely to put an  
end
 to such a  
hamil
 eating habit. Another supporting reason is that nutrition  
education
 programs compared to other measures such as imposing higher taxes, could result in more sustainable  
awareness
 and behavior  
change
 among  
people
 from all walks of life,  
especially
 children and adolescents. These beneficiaries will  
ciliate
 a lifetime habit of refraining from  
junk
  food
 or restricting such  
intale
.
To sum up, although there are reasonable arguments against  
education
, I  
firmly
 believe that educational measures would  
significantly
  mitigatejurik
  food
 consumption and deter the problem from  
being exacerbated
  further
.