Government financial aid based on merit turns education from a right available to all students into a privilege primarily for the wealthy.
"[T]he increased use of merit aid is associated with a decrease in enrollment of low-income and minority students." This quote from a study done by Amanda L. Griffith, a professor of economics at Wake Forest University, was cited in a statement calling for an end to merit based financial aid which was issued by a group of private college presidents (Gardner). Making financial aid entirely dependent upon merit makes college education even more class and race entitled (and biased) than it is already. As Catherine Rampell wrote, “Merit metrics like SAT scores tend to closely correlate with family income; about 1 in 5 students from households with income over $250,000 receives merit aid from his or her school. For families making less than $30,000, it’s 1 in 10” (Rampell). Basing financial aid for students on "merit" serves to lock low-income people into poverty; regardless of whether it was intended or not, merit-based financing also has racial and gender bias.
Also, the very term merit based is misleading. As Chelsea Jones put it, “There is a
misnomer in a term commonly used in higher education: merit aid. The use of 'merit’ implies
Conti 2
excellence or worthy of praise, but unfortunately, in this context, merit is often synonymous with privilege.” The truth is, many low income students who cannot obtain merit-based scholarships are just as smart as their higher income counterparts who can get the merit-based financial aid but they happen to be unable to take part in the various extracurricular activities that play a big role in determining whether they are a star candidate for a merit-based scholarship or not. A low-income student not only might not have the ability to attend extracurricular activities depending on where her or his school is located, they might also have to work part-time just to make ends meet even if their school had those opportunities (Jones). Also, are students with disabilities that make it difficult or impossible to participate in extracurricular activities, going to be less able to secure merit based financial aid? Lastly, single mothers who have one child or more to take care of, in addition to class and possibly work as well, would be unfairly impacted by a decision to make government financial aid for student's merit based. This would, and already does, make it gender biased. That, in combination with the fact that women who are equally qualified still tend to get paid less than men for the same jobs, makes this sexist.
While the amount of money that is dedicated to merit based financial aid increases, the amount of money available for need based financial aid proportionately decreases. Likewise, while the amount of merit based financial aid increases, the number of students who receive need-based aid decreases - IE Pell Grant. The result is fewer black students on the campus:
Griffith, an assistant professor of economics at Wake Forest University, found that “the use of merit aid is associated with changes in the socioeconomic and racial composition of the study body.” According to the report, within three to five years of introducing a merit aid program, the two top tiers of private colleges saw their share of Pell Grant
Conti 3
recipients fall by 6 percentage points. At bottom-tier schools, the proportion of Pell Grant recipients initially rose but ultimately dropped by 2 percentage points within 10 years of the creation of such a program. The study also found that the introduction of a merit aid program led to a reduction in the representation of black students at top-tier schools (qtd. in Burd 5).
Another problem with merit based financial aid is that colleges and universities are dedicating a lot of resources to attracting “desirable” students who are high scoring and have high achievements. This is all to enhance the university's prestige. But what of everyone else? What of those who have disabilities or those who must help take care of siblings or other relatives with disabilities? What of the students who have to work part time or even full time to get by and are not able to spend as much time on their class work as they would like, or as their class work really requires, having lower grades as a result? What of the LGBTQ students of color? David Johns, executive director of the National Black Justice Coalition, (a civil rights organization focused on the empowerment of LGBTQ people) and former executive director of the White House Initiative on Educational Excellence for African Americans, summarized it by saying:
The ability for postsecondary institutions to provide credentials, certificates and degrees that are required for certain types of jobs are further stratified or further marginalizing individuals who are from communities that are most under supported or least likely to
have access to the high-quality schools…without need-based financial aid (qtd. in
Conti 4
Elfman).
Making student aid merit based only for them would effectively shut them out.
Statistically speaking, there is plenty of evidence showing that white students are much
more likely to receive merit based financial aid than students of color (Racial Breakdown of Financial Aid). At the same time, black and Chicana people earn less than white people do (Kochhar and Cilluffo). Taken together, making financial aid merit based only serves to further entrap people of color in a vicious cycle of poverty and inequality. It is white supremacist regardless of whether that is the intent of those who trying to implement it. In a country that disproportionately incarcerates people of color, people who get out of prison and want to try to restart their lives by getting a college degree will find it much more difficult to do so in Georgia which has absolutely no need based financial aid. All financial aid there is merit based (Total Grant Aid Awarded).
In conclusion, making government financial aid for students based solely on merit has already been shown to be an unmitigated disaster for the low income, disabled, working mothers and people of color. It amounts to educational apartheid and as already stated, it means that government student aid pretty much becomes available only to those who least need it. To
paraphrase Catherine Rampell, who is quoting Mark Kantrowitz, the publisher at Edvisors.com,
for low income students, the six year graduation rate is 45 percent when grants cover one quarter
Conti 5
of the college costs but it goes up to 68 percent when grants cover three fourths of the college cost; Looking at the statistics for high income students though, the graduation rates are about 78 percent either way. Merit based financing has also been shown to cause lower college attendance for non-white students. Education should be viewed as a right and not a privilege, thereforetherefore not only must we no longer consider merit-based student financial aid programs, we must go further, enact federal laws which prohibit states from using merit based financial student aid programs and force the states that are using merit based financial aid to immediately discontinue that practice and return the use of need based financial aid.
Works Cited
“A Racial Breakdown of Financial Aid”, The Journal of Blacks in Higher Education, 23 October, 2011, Accessed 29 January, 2020 www.jbhe.com/2011/10/a-racial-breakdown-of-financial-aid/
Burd, Stephen “Undermining Pell, How Colleges Compete for Wealthy Students and Leave the Low-Income Behind.” May, 2013, Accessed 29 January, 2020
s3.amazonaws.com/new-america-composer/attachments_archive/Merit_Aid%20Final.pdf
Bloomberg Opinion “Give Money to College Students Who Need It.” 28 February, 2018, Accessed 29 January, 2020
www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2018-02-28/merit-scholarships-don-t-help-college-students-who-need-it-most
Elfman, Lois “Report: Diminishing Financial Aid for Low-Income Students.” Diverse: Issues In Higher Education, 16 February, 2020, Accessed 8 March, 2020 --DELETED LINK--
Gardner, Lee “Private-College Presidents Urge a Commitment to Need-Based Aid.” Chronicle of Higher Education, 00095982, 18 January, 2013, Vol. 59, Issue 19, Accessed 27 February, 2020
Database: Academic Search Complete --DELETED LINK--
Jones, Chelsey “The Problem With Merit Aid.” 11 December, 2014, edtrust.org/the-equity-line/the-problem-with-merit-aid/ Accessed 29 January, 2020.
Kochhar, Rakesh and Cilluffo, Anthony “Key findings on the rise in income inequality within America’s racial and ethnic groups.” FACT TANK, 12 July, 2018 www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/07/12/key-findings-on-the-rise-in-income-inequality-within-americas-racial-and-ethnic-groups/ Accessed 30 January, 2020
Rampell, Catherine. “Freebies for the Rich.” New York Times Magazine, 24 September, 2013, www.nytimes.com/2013/09/29/magazine/freebies-for-the-rich.html, 29 Accessed February, 2020
Lederman, Doug. “State’s Slow Steady Embrace of Need-Based Aid Total Grant Aid.” Inside Higher ED, 5 November, 2018, 30 Accessed January, 2020 www.insidehighered.com/sites/default/server_files/media/nassgap%20table.jpg?width=500&height=500
Government
financial
aid
based on
merit
turns
education
from a right available to all
students
into a privilege
primarily
for the wealthy.
"
[T]he increased
use
of
merit
aid
is associated
with a decrease in enrollment of low-income and minority students.
"
This quote from a study done by Amanda L. Griffith, a professor of economics at Wake Forest University,
was cited
in a statement calling for an
end
to
merit
based
financial
aid
which
was issued
by a group of private college presidents (Gardner). Making
financial
aid
entirely
dependent upon
merit
makes
college
education
even more
class
and race entitled (and biased) than it is
already
. As Catherine
Rampell
wrote,
“Merit
metrics like SAT scores tend to
closely
correlate with family
income
; about 1 in 5
students
from households with
income
over $250,000 receives
merit
aid
from
his or her
school
. For families making
less
than $30,000, it’s 1 in 10” (
Rampell
). Basing
financial
aid
for
students
on
"
merit
"
serves to lock low-income
people
into poverty; regardless of whether it
was intended
or not, merit-based financing
also
has
racial
and gender bias.
Also
, the
very
term
merit
based is misleading. As Chelsea Jones put it, “There is a
misnomer in a term
commonly
used
in higher
education
:
merit
aid
. The
use
of 'merit’ implies
Conti
2
excellence or worthy of praise,
but
unfortunately, in this context,
merit
is
often
synonymous with privilege.” The truth is,
many
low
income
students
who
cannot obtain merit-based scholarships are
just
as smart as their higher
income
counterparts
who
can
get
the merit-based
financial
aid
but
they happen to be unable to
take part
in the various extracurricular activities that play a
big
role in determining whether they are a star candidate for a merit-based scholarship or not. A low-income
student
not
only
might not have the ability to attend extracurricular activities depending on where her or his
school
is located
, they might
also
have to
work
part-time
just
to
make
ends
meet
even if their
school
had those opportunities (Jones).
Also
, are
students
with disabilities that
make
it difficult or impossible to participate in extracurricular activities, going to be
less
able to secure
merit
based
financial
aid
?
Lastly
, single mothers
who
have one child or more to take care of,
in addition
to
class
and
possibly
work
as well
, would be
unfairly
impacted by a decision to
make
government
financial
aid
for student's
merit
based. This would, and
already
does,
make
it gender biased. That, in combination with the fact that women
who
are
equally
qualified
still
tend to
get
paid
less
than
men
for the same jobs,
makes
this sexist.
While the
amount
of money that
is dedicated
to
merit
based
financial
aid
increases, the
amount
of money available for
need
based
financial
aid
proportionately
decreases.
Likewise
, while the
amount
of
merit
based
financial
aid
increases, the number of
students
who
receive need-based
aid
decreases
-
IE Pell
Grant
. The result is fewer black
students
on the campus:
Griffith, an assistant professor of economics at Wake Forest University, found that “the
use
of
merit
aid
is associated
with
changes
in the socioeconomic and
racial
composition of the study body.” According to the report, within three to five years of introducing a
merit
aid
program
, the two top tiers of private colleges
saw
their share of
Pell
Grant
Conti
3
recipients fall by 6 percentage points. At bottom-tier
schools
, the proportion of
Pell
Grant
recipients
initially
rose
but
ultimately
dropped by 2 percentage points within 10 years of the creation of such a
program
. The study
also
found that the introduction of a
merit
aid
program
led to a reduction in the representation of black
students
at top-tier
schools
(
qtd
. in
Burd
5).
Another problem with
merit
based
financial
aid
is that colleges and universities are dedicating
a lot of
resources to attracting “desirable”
students
who
are high scoring and have high achievements. This is all to enhance the university's prestige.
But
what of everyone else? What of those
who
have disabilities or those
who
must
help
take care of siblings or other relatives with disabilities? What of the
students
who
have to
work
part
time
or even full
time
to
get
by and are not able to spend as
much
time
on their
class
work
as they would like, or as their
class
work
really
requires, having lower grades
as a result
?
What
of the LGBTQ
students
of
color
? David Johns, executive director of the National Black Justice Coalition, (a civil rights organization focused on the empowerment of LGBTQ
people)
and former executive director of the
White
House
Initiative on Educational Excellence for African Americans, summarized it by saying:
The ability for
postsecondary
institutions to provide credentials, certificates and degrees that
are required
for certain types of jobs are
further
stratified or
further
marginalizing individuals
who
are from communities that are most under supported or least likely to
have access to the high-quality schools…without need-based
financial
aid
(
qtd
. in
Conti
4
Elfman
).
Making
student
aid
merit
based
only
for them would
effectively
shut them out.
Statistically
speaking, there is
plenty
of evidence showing that
white
students
are
much
more likely to receive
merit
based
financial
aid
than
students
of
color
(Racial
Breakdown of
Financial
Aid)
. At the same
time
, black and Chicana
people
earn
less
than
white
people
do (
Kochhar
and
Cilluffo
). Taken together, making
financial
aid
merit
based
only
serves to
further
entrap
people
of
color
in a vicious cycle of poverty and inequality. It is
white
supremacist regardless of whether
that is
the intent of those
who
trying to implement it. In a country that
disproportionately
incarcerates
people
of
color
,
people
who
get
out of prison and want to try to restart their
lives
by getting a college degree will find it
much
more difficult to do
so
in Georgia which has
absolutely
no
need
based
financial
aid
. All
financial
aid
there is
merit
based (Total
Grant
Aid
Awarded).
In conclusion
, making
government
financial
aid
for
students
based
solely
on
merit
has
already
been shown
to be an unmitigated disaster for the low
income
, disabled, working mothers and
people
of
color
. It
amounts
to educational apartheid and as
already
stated, it means that
government
student
aid
pretty
much
becomes available
only
to those
who
least
need
it. To
paraphrase Catherine
Rampell
,
who
is quoting Mark
Kantrowitz
, the publisher at Edvisors.com,
for low
income
students
, the
six year
graduation rate is 45 percent when
grants
cover one quarter
Conti
5
of the college costs
but
it goes up to 68 percent when
grants
cover three fourths of the college cost; Looking at the statistics for high
income
students
though, the graduation rates are about 78 percent either way.
Merit
based financing has
also
been shown
to cause lower college attendance for non-white
students
.
Education
should
be viewed
as a right and not a privilege,
thereforetherefore
not
only
must
we no longer consider merit-based
student
financial
aid
programs
, we
must
go
further
, enact federal laws which prohibit states from using
merit
based
financial
student
aid
programs
and force the states that are using
merit
based
financial
aid
to immediately discontinue that practice and return the
use
of
need
based
financial
aid.
Works Cited
“A
Racial
Breakdown of
Financial
Aid”
, The Journal of Blacks in Higher
Education
, 23
October, 2011
,
Accessed
29
January, 2020
www.jbhe.com/2011/10/a-racial-breakdown-of-financial-aid/
Burd
, Stephen “Undermining
Pell
, How Colleges Compete for Wealthy
Students
and
Leave
the Low-Income Behind.”
May, 2013
,
Accessed
29
January, 2020
s3.amazonaws.com/new-america-composer/attachments_archive/Merit_Aid%20Final.pdf
Bloomberg Opinion “Give Money to College
Students
Who
Need
It.” 28
February, 2018
,
Accessed
29
January, 2020
www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2018-02-28/merit-scholarships-don-t-
help
-college-students-who-need-it-most
Elfman
, Lois “Report: Diminishing
Financial
Aid
for Low-Income
Students.”
Diverse: Issues In Higher
Education
, 16
February, 2020
,
Accessed
8
March, 2020
--DELETED LINK--
Gardner, Lee “Private-College Presidents Urge a Commitment to Need-Based
Aid.”
Chronicle of Higher
Education
, 00095982, 18
January, 2013
, Vol. 59, Issue 19,
Accessed
27
February, 2020
Database: Academic Search Complete --DELETED LINK--
Jones,
Chelsey
“The Problem With
Merit
Aid.”
11
December, 2014
, edtrust.org/the-equity-line/the-problem-with-merit-aid/
Accessed
29
January, 2020
.
Kochhar
, Rakesh and
Cilluffo
, Anthony “Key findings on the rise in
income
inequality within America’s
racial
and ethnic groups.” FACT TANK, 12
July, 2018
www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/07/12/key-findings-on-the-rise-in-income-inequality-within-americas-racial-and-ethnic-groups/
Accessed
30
January, 2020
Rampell
, Catherine. “Freebies for the Rich.” New York
Times
Magazine, 24
September, 2013
, www.nytimes.com/2013/09/29/magazine/freebies-for-the-rich.html, 29
Accessed
February, 2020
Lederman
, Doug. “State’s Slow Steady Embrace of Need-Based
Aid
Total
Grant
Aid.”
Inside Higher ED, 5
November, 2018
, 30
Accessed
January, 2020
www.insidehighered.com/sites/default/server_files/media/nassgap%20table.jpg?width=500&height=500