Although some people believe that art is an indispensable part of the syllabus for children at school, whereas others opine that it is wastage of their time. However, both have their own pros and cons. Therefore, this essay will discuss both views and then I would give my opinion in the subsequent paragraphs.
To commence with the argument, art is undoubtedly a fundamental player of reflection of our emotions. Thus, it is of keen importance that owing to its significance, it must be kept and taught at school because art is a mirror of the children's feelings. For instance, on different occasions, what they do not express in words, they portray on cards for their parents. Hence, learning, creativity at school as a result, creates strong bonding in children with their parents.
Conversely, other people advocate that spending hours to educate children about the arts is a complete waste of time and that should be spent on learning useful subjects such as: physics or mathematics. Owing to the fact that enhances their practical skill. To illustrate, children become more interested in the subjects for which they spend more time to study. As a result of this, proponents put forward arguments that learning science could generate useful professions which could help make the globe a better place to live, and teaching art is less fruitful for nations and world.
To conclude the aforementioned, I am predisposed to argue that teaching art as a subject is imperative in schools and it is a full utilization of timetable rather than wastage, as it infuses society with positive benefits in the form of culture transfer from generations. Also, I hold a firm point of view that avoiding art will produce devastating effects upon society as a result of losing value in children.
Although
some
people
believe that
art
is an indispensable part of the syllabus for
children
at
school
, whereas others opine that it is wastage of their time.
However
, both have their
own
pros and cons.
Therefore
, this essay will discuss both views and then I would give my opinion in the subsequent paragraphs.
To commence with the argument,
art
is
undoubtedly
a fundamental player of reflection of our emotions.
Thus
, it is of keen importance that owing to its significance, it
must
be
kept
and taught at
school
because
art
is a mirror of the children's feelings.
For instance
, on
different
occasions, what they do not express in words, they portray on cards for their parents.
Hence
, learning, creativity at
school
as a result
, creates strong bonding in
children
with their parents.
Conversely
, other
people
advocate that spending hours to educate
children
about the
arts
is a complete waste of time and that should
be spent
on learning useful subjects such as: physics or mathematics. Owing to the fact that enhances their practical
skill
. To illustrate,
children
become more interested in the subjects for which they spend more time to study.
As a result
of this, proponents put forward arguments that learning science could generate useful professions which could
help
make
the globe a better place to
live
, and teaching
art
is less fruitful for nations and world.
To conclude
the aforementioned, I
am predisposed
to argue that teaching
art
as a subject is imperative in
schools
and it is a full utilization of timetable
rather
than wastage, as it infuses society with
positive
benefits in the form of culture transfer from generations.
Also
, I hold a firm point of view that avoiding
art
will produce devastating effects upon society
as a result
of losing value in
children
.