Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Is it the government’s responsibility to solve environmental problems, or should individuals take action.

Is it the government’s responsibility to solve environmental problems, or should individuals take action. 5bm9A

Nowadays, there are some programs to preserve earth among many developing countries. Currently, as a president of the US Joe Biden did a number of meetings with the biggest countries leaders in order to prevent the climate problems which can be happened on earth near future. Although some people argue that to solve environmental problems is responsibility of government, others believe it is not only related to government, but also to the people too. In this essay I will look at both side of argument and give my opinion. Many people hold the view that only governments can tackle the environmental issues. This is because they say it countries will cope problems in its such as to stop action of plants and factories which are affecting on air and water pollution. For example due to this kind of factories’ impacts the degree of weather is getting higher within a few years. There is a common belief that people should take action solving climate troubles too. There is an argument that individuals should pay close attention to what is happening in their environment. They should not be carefree to the cases that may damage the nature. For instance, every person have to has a positive view into this problem. This means that, even every person should not burn rubbish or drop it to water. In conclusion, there is two different opinion to solve climate problems. One of them is responsibility of government to problem and on the other hand it would be people can contribute this issue mostly. And I completely agree with both side of argument, It is our vital problem and everyone should responsible to it.

Nowadays, there are This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 programs to preserve earth among This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :Third World countrieslow-income countries
developing countries
. Currently
, as a president of the US Joe Biden did a number of meetings with the biggest countries leaders in order to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :preclude
prevent
 the climate You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcomplicationdilemmaquestionobstacletroubledispute
problems
 which can be happened
 on earth near future. Although This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 argue that to solve environmental You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcomplicationdilemmaquestionobstacletroubledispute
problems
 is responsibility of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpowerministryunionauthoritystaterule
government
, others believe it is not This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 related to You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpowerministryunionauthoritystaterule
government
, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
also
 to the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 too. In this essay I will look at both side of argument and give my opinion.

This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
Many
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 hold the view that This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpowerministryunionauthoritystaterule
governments
 can tackle the environmental issues. This is This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 they say it countries will cope You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcomplicationdilemmaquestionobstacletroubledispute
problems
 in its such as to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :terminateceasediscontinue
stop
 action of plants and factories which are affecting on air and water pollution. For example
 due to this kind of factories’ impacts the degree of weather is getting higher within a few years.

There is a common belief that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 should take action solving climate troubles too. There is an argument that individuals should pay close attention to what is happening in their environment. They should not be carefree to the cases that may damage the nature. For instance
, every person This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:ought to
have to
The verb after "to" should be in the base form: "have".have
has
 a This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:beneficial
positive
 view into this You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcomplicationdilemmaquestionobstacletroubledispute
problem
. This means that, even every person should not burn rubbish or drop it to water.

In conclusion
, there is two This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:various
different
 opinion to solve climate You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcomplicationdilemmaquestionobstacletroubledispute
problems
. One of them is responsibility of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpowerministryunionauthoritystaterule
government
 to You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcomplicationdilemmaquestionobstacletroubledispute
problem
 and on the other hand
 it would be You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 can contribute this issue mostly
. And I completely This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :acquiesce
agree
 with both side of argument, It is our vital You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcomplicationdilemmaquestionobstacletroubledispute
problem
 and everyone should responsible to it. 