Is it better to have a singal language in the whole world. To what extent do you agree or diagree?
Is it better to have a singal language in the whole world. pajoy
For the whole world, it is good to have a common language. I largely agree with this statement but I disagree to some extent. The related ideas will be explained in the upcoming paragraphs. To commence with, a single language is better for the whole work because it can help to boost up communication skills. To elaborate it, if people speak only one language, they can easily understand their feelings and can give respect to each other. Moreover, having a common language in the world can save time. To explain it, there are plethora of languages in the world. Nobody cannot know the meaning of every word. In this situation, they prefer to translate in their own dialect. As a result, it is soo time consuming. If one language is allowed in the whole world, masses do not require to interpret it. They can save their time. For example, in China, only chinese language is used by every people and they easily save enough time without translating in comparison to Canada because majority of multilinguals lives there. However, one language can lose the value of different cultures. To illustrate it, every language is depend on the geographical features and culture of that area. If single language is used by the individuals, they can forget their tradition, religion and culture. Owing to it, new generation will not aware of it. For instance, a survey conducted by the government of India concluded that 75% Indians forgot Hindi language due to the popularity of English. In conclusion, it is clear that one language is not time consuming as well as can boost up communication skills, but it’s regular use is not beneficial because the value of culture and tradition can be lost.
For the whole
world
, it is
good
to have a common
language
. I
largely
agree
with this statement
but
I disagree to
some
extent. The related
ideas
will be
explained
in the upcoming paragraphs. To commence with, a single
language
is better for the whole work
because
it can
help
to boost up communication
skills
. To elaborate it, if
people
speak
only
one
language
, they can
easily
understand their feelings and can give respect to each other.
Moreover
, having a common
language
in the
world
can save
time
. To
explain
it, there are plethora of
languages
in the
world
. Nobody cannot know the meaning of every word. In this situation, they prefer to translate in their
own
dialect.
As a result
, it is
soo
time consuming
. If one
language
is
allowed
in the whole
world
, masses do not require to interpret it. They can save their
time
.
For example
, in China,
only
chinese
language
is
used
by every
people and
they
easily
save
enough
time
without translating
in comparison
to Canada
because
majority of
multilinguals
lives
there.
However
, one
language
can lose the value of
different
cultures
. To illustrate it, every
language
is
depend
on the geographical features and
culture
of that area. If single
language
is
used
by the individuals, they can forget their tradition, religion and
culture
. Owing to it, new generation will not aware of it.
For instance
, a survey conducted by the
government
of India concluded that 75% Indians forgot Hindi
language
due to the popularity of English.
In conclusion
, it is
clear
that one
language
is not
time consuming
as well
as can boost up communication
skills
,
but
it’s regular
use
is not beneficial
because
the value of
culture
and tradition can
be lost
.