Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Individuals have no right towards the protection of environment but the government and big companies have.Do you agree or disagree.

Individuals have no right towards the protection of environment but the government and big companies have. 9wnrx
It is certainly true that problems related to the environment are being constantly increased at an alarming rate. Therefore, it is considered that it is the prime responsibility of the government and big companies to protect the environment. However, I agree to some extent with this notion because it is a fundamental duty of every individual that he/she should always think about environmental protection. why it is pondered that big companies and governments have a responsibility to save the environment. First and foremost, the government have the authority to convenience everyone for following the rules and regulation which are set up by the government to save the environment: government should make strict rules on the destruction of forests, the law against harmful pollution, chemical uses, haunting on animals and restriction on littering on roads. For this, the government can educate people by showing the importance of an appropriate environment for health. In addition, big companies should avoid using harmful chemicals to make products and things just for profits. And they should make green products and also encourage people to use more green products rather than the use unbiodegradable. To exemplify, it is accounted 75% of manufacturing companies use more harmful ingredients or chemicals to make the durability of products which affect the environment on the flip side, it is a fundamental duty of every individual who makes the environment healthy and smooth for all living things. First, individuals should not throw garbage around roads or congested areas because when wastage burns it creates a filthy smell which makes the air unhealthy, therefore people should use dustbins or garbage containers. Moreover, to protect the environment, it is must plant more trees in free areas to make the air clean. For instance, it has been proved that one tree provides oxygen to ten people. To conclude, although the government and big companies must protect the environment yet it is a fundamental duty of the individuals that they should use dustbins for garbage, plant trees, and also use public transportation.
It is
certainly
true that problems related to the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
are being
constantly
increased at an alarming rate.
Therefore
, it
is considered
that it is the prime responsibility of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
big
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
to protect the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
.
However
, I
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
agree
to
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
extent with this notion
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
it is a fundamental duty of every
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
individual
that he/she should always
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
think
about environmental protection.

This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
why
it
is pondered
that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
big
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
governments
have a responsibility to save the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
.
First
and foremost, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
have the authority to convenience everyone for following the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
rules
and regulation which
are set
up by the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
to save the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
:
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
should
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
make
strict
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
rules
on the destruction of forests, the law against harmful pollution, chemical
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
uses
, haunting on animals and restriction on littering on roads. For this, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
can educate
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
by showing the importance of an appropriate
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
for health.
In addition
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
big
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
should avoid using harmful chemicals to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
make
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
products
and things
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
just
for profits. And they should
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
make
green
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
products
and
also
encourage
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
more green
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
products
rather
than the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
Possible spelling mistake found.
unbiodegradable
. To exemplify, it
is accounted
75% of manufacturing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
more harmful ingredients or chemicals to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
make
the durability of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
products
which affect the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
on the flip side, it is a fundamental duty of every
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
individual
who
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
makes
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
healthy and smooth for all living things.
First
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
individuals
should not throw garbage around roads or congested areas
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
when wastage burns it creates a filthy smell which
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
makes
the air unhealthy,
therefore
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
should
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
dustbins or garbage containers.
Moreover
, to protect the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
, it is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
must
plant more trees in free areas to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
make
the air clean.
For instance
, it has
been proved
that one tree provides oxygen to ten
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
.

To conclude
, although the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
big
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
must
protect the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
yet
it is a fundamental duty of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
individuals
that they should
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
dustbins for garbage, plant trees, and
also
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
public transportation.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Individuals have no right towards the protection of environment but the government and big companies have.

Essay
  American English
3 paragraphs
337 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts