Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment, only governments and large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree? v.42

Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment, only governments and large companies can make a difference. v. 42
The ambiance should be protected by the people, because governments and the mammoth industries would not alone solve the problem of the atmosphere. I, holistically, disagree with this viewpoint due to the importance of citizen's helping hands in protecting the earth, without them all the initiatives of authorities would prove unproductive. To begin with, although astronomical organizations as well as the leaders of the country tend to succour financially to save the nature, general people have the responsibility to execute the task comprehensively. For example, in Bangladesh, the bureaucrats invest a huge amount of money in organizing seminars, which could eventually, help to raise awareness among people to control the pollution that generates many diseases into the atmosphere. If the people of this terrain will not implement the activity which has been assigned to them, all these slogans are useless, and the investment in the parade, marching, et Cetra for the protection of the environment would to the ashtray. In contrast, it is justifiable to say that if the authorities do not support the population financially, it is quite impossible to achieve the pollutant free atmosphere in cities and towns. This is because the local population has not enough money for making different types of events such as leaflets, organizing national and international seminars, advertisements on TV-news, YouTube, and newspapers, to name but a few, which are considered as the actual media to reach people who will learn from these types of activities. As a result, they will be confident enough to abstain from throwing wastage here and there, which not only beautify the environs but also minimize pernicious particles. In conclusion, the population of the country is not responsible to protect the natural environment of the world, while only the leader and a huge organization can only provide the necessities which might help to save the country. In my opinion, if each individual does not come forward to make nature free from dirt, the government can not resolve this issue.
The ambiance should
be protected
by the
people
,
because
governments
and the mammoth industries would not alone solve the problem of the atmosphere. I,
holistically
, disagree with this viewpoint due to the importance of citizen's helping hands in protecting the earth, without them all the initiatives of authorities would prove unproductive.

To
begin
with, although astronomical organizations
as well
as the leaders of the country tend to
succour
financially
to save the nature, general
people
have the responsibility to execute the task
comprehensively
.
For example
, in Bangladesh, the bureaucrats invest a huge amount of money in organizing seminars, which could
eventually
,
help
to raise awareness among
people
to control the pollution that generates
many
diseases into the atmosphere. If the
people
of this terrain will not implement the activity which has
been assigned
to them, all these slogans are useless, and the investment in the parade, marching,
et
Cetra
for the protection of the environment would to the ashtray.

In contrast
, it is justifiable to say that if the authorities do not support the population
financially
, it is quite impossible to achieve the pollutant free atmosphere in cities and towns. This is
because
the local population has not
enough
money for making
different
types of
events
such as leaflets, organizing national and international seminars, advertisements on TV-news, YouTube, and newspapers, to name
but
a few, which
are considered
as the actual media to reach
people
who will learn from these types of activities.
As a result
, they will be confident
enough
to abstain from throwing wastage here and there, which not
only
beautify the environs
but
also
minimize pernicious particles.

In conclusion
, the population of the country is not responsible to protect the natural environment of the world, while
only
the leader and a huge organization can
only
provide the necessities which might
help
to save the country. In my opinion, if each individual does not
come
forward to
make
nature free from dirt, the
government
can not resolve this issue.
8.5Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
8.5Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
8.5Mistakes

IELTS essay Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment, only governments and large companies can make a difference. v. 42

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
331 words
8.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 8.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 8.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 8.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 8.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts