Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective? v.4

Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems What other measures do you think might be effective? v. 4
Nowadays people think that the ultimate method of solving the problem of traffic jam and pollution is to raise the cost of petrol. From my point of view, I totally disagree with this opinion as I believe that there are other measures which might be much more effective than increasing petrol price. There are reasons why I do not approve of the given opinion. First and foremost, pushing up the price of petrol will make no changes to people’s habit of commuting to work by private cars. Given the inconvenience of the public transport system, no matter how expensive petrol is, people still have to rely on cars without having any possible alternations. What is more, increasing petrol price will lead to high cost of transportation, which may affect local economy as the price of goods rises. Therefore, it is counterproductive to raise fuel prices in order to tackle the problems of traffic congestion and pollution. Measures could be taken to solve the problem of traffic jam include limiting the number of private cars in the city centre and encourage more people to use public transports such as buses or the metro. In order to make public transport passenger-friendly, the network should be expanded and the frequency should also be increased. Moreover, local authorities have to subsidize buses and trains in order to attract more people. In terms of solving pollution problem, nowadays thanks to the development of the energy industry, there are various types of renewable power sources in which cars can use such as solar power, wind energy or electricity – all of them are environmentally friendly. As long as they are put into practice, certainly no worries have to be made on the disposal of exhaust fumes from cars. In conclusion, I believe that increasing petrol price is not efficient since people still have to rely on their cars, given the inconvenience of the public transport. Instead, only by providing people with the amenities in public transportation facilities and applying renewable sources of energy to cars could traffic congestion and pollution be solved.
Nowadays
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
think
that the ultimate method of solving the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
problem
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
traffic
jam and pollution is to raise the cost of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
petrol
. From my point of view, I
totally
disagree with this opinion as I believe that there are other measures which might be much more effective than increasing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
petrol
price.

There are reasons why I do not approve of the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
opinion.
First
and foremost, pushing up the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
price
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
petrol
will
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
no
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
changes
to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people’s
habit of commuting to work by private
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
.
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
Given
the inconvenience of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
public
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transport
system, no matter how expensive
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
petrol
is,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
still
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
have to
rely on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
without having any possible alternations.
What is more
, increasing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
petrol
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
price
will lead to high cost of transportation, which may affect local economy as the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
price
of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
goods
rises.
Therefore
, it is counterproductive to raise fuel
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
prices
in order to tackle the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
problems
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
traffic
congestion and pollution.

Measures could
be taken
to solve the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
problem
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
traffic
jam include limiting the number of private
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
in the city
Possible spelling mistake. 'centre' is British English.
centre
and encourage more
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
public
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transports
such as buses or the metro. In order to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
public
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transport
passenger-friendly, the network should
be expanded
and the frequency should
also
be increased
.
Moreover
, local authorities
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
have to
subsidize buses and trains in order to attract more
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
. In terms of solving pollution
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
problem
, nowadays thanks to the development of the energy industry, there are various types of renewable power sources in which
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
such as solar power, wind energy or electricity
Consider using an m-dash if you do not want to join two words.
–
all of them are
environmentally
friendly. As long as they
are put
into practice,
certainly
no worries
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
have to
be made
on the disposal of exhaust fumes from cars.

In conclusion
, I believe that increasing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
petrol
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
price
is not efficient since
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
still
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
have to
rely on their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
the inconvenience of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
public
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transport
.
Instead
,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
by providing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
with the amenities in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
public
transportation facilities and applying renewable sources of energy to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
could
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
traffic
congestion and pollution
be solved
.
7Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
7Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
7Mistakes

IELTS essay Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems What other measures do you think might be effective? v. 4

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
346 words
7.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 7.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 7.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts


Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective? v.4