Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective? v.32

Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. What other measures do you think might be effective? v. 32
Many people believe that increasing the gasoline rates would be the best possible mean to reduce the traffic issues and growing pollution. Although a rise in petroleum cost may have some impact on traffic and pollution problems, it is definitely not the best option because it would result in inflation in the country. So I have to completely disagree with this. The better way to solve these problems would be to improve public transport and increase taxation on private cars. To begin with, raising the fuel prices would lead to a significant inflation in the country. Clearly, a rise in the cost of fuel would lead to a higher expenditure on the transports of goods, which would see people buying the daily household items like grocery and vegetables at a much higher rates. Similarly, it would affect the energy production expenditure from fossil fuels, resulting in expensive electricity being provided to the industry, which would in turn also rise the production cost, further contributing to a price hike. I, therefore, believe that increasing petrol prices would not be a wise idea to mitigate traffic and pollution concerns. The best way to meet these issues would be to introduce taxation on private cars' travelling and parking, and also improve the public transport. In other words, if a better alternatives to car travelling could be made available to the public in terms of cheap, safe, comfortable and convenient buses, trams and trains, and also by increasing the routes to carry maximum passengers from all parts of the city, people would love to shift from private cars to these facilities. Moreover, further taxation on private car utility as well as an increase in parking fee would also discourage people to use personal vehicles. All these steps would help solve the environmental and transport issues of a country. To conclude, I firmly believe that increasing fuel rates is not the solution of transportation and emission challenges, rather legislation to increase taxes on the use of personal vehicle and availability of better alternatives would help controlling these issues.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Many
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
believe that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
increasing
the gasoline rates would be the best possible mean to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduce
the traffic
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
issues
and growing pollution. Although a rise in petroleum cost may have
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
impact on traffic and pollution problems, it is definitely not the best option
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
it would result in inflation in the country.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
So
I
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
have to
completely disagree with this. The better way to solve these problems would be to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
improve
public
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transport
and increase taxation on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
private
cars.

To
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
begin
with, raising the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fuel
prices would lead to a significant inflation in the country.
Clearly
, a rise in the cost of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fuel
would lead to a higher expenditure on the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transports
of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
goods
, which would
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
see
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
buying the daily household items like grocery and vegetables at a much higher rates.
Similarly
, it would affect the energy production expenditure from fossil
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fuels
, resulting in expensive electricity
being provided
to the industry, which would in turn
also
rise the production cost,
further
contributing to a price hike. I,
therefore
, believe that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
increasing
petrol prices would not be a wise
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
idea
to mitigate traffic and pollution concerns.

The best way to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
meet
these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
issues
would be to introduce taxation on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
private
cars' travelling and parking, and
also
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
improve
the public
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transport
.
In other words
, if a better alternatives to car travelling could
be made
available to the public in terms of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
cheap
, safe, comfortable and convenient buses, trams and trains, and
also
by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
increasing
the routes to carry maximum passengers from all parts of the city,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
would
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
love
to shift from
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
private
cars to these facilities.
Moreover
,
further
taxation on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
private
car utility
as well
as an increase in parking fee would
also
discourage
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
personal vehicles. All these steps would
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
help
solve the environmental and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transport
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
issues
of a country.

To conclude
, I
firmly
believe that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
increasing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
fuel
rates is not the solution of transportation and emission challenges,
rather
legislation to increase taxes on the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
of personal vehicle and availability of better alternatives would
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
help
The verb 'help' is used with an infinitive: "to control" or "control".
controlling
these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
issues
.
8.5Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
8.5Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
8.5Mistakes

IELTS essay Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. What other measures do you think might be effective? v. 32

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
343 words
8.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 8.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 8.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 8.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 8.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts


Recent posts