Museum contains the information about the cultural and historical background. It is argued by some that these days, every kinds of knowledge are available on internet, owing to this, museums are no longer needed by the public. I largly disagree with this notion and this essay intends to explicate that museums are more important than internet.
On the one hand, the rapid advancement of technology and internet alliws peole obtain information easily. To elaborate it, people can search any topic related to history and culture with the help of internet and they can access any kind of knowledge without face any trouble as well as without wasting time. However, going to museums for those materials is definitely waste of time, money and energy.
On the other hand, opponents of such a thought ague against it for several reasons. Firstly, museums are good places for local citizens and travellers to enhance their knowledge about culture and history. Museums are the place where experts preserved the country heritages, by paying visit to museums with family during holidays, young people are able to see the country histories. Secondly, it is the best leisure activities, when people visit museums the see many traditional paintings and students can learn easily when they see paintings and portrait.
By contrast, vast amount of knowledge on internet is may be wrong, which effects the people's knowledge. Due to this, museum knowledge is more realistic than internet.
To conclude, although important knowledge of culture and history is freely available on internet, by I believe that museums are still good place to educate the local residents and even the foreign travellers. 
 Museum
 contains the information about the cultural and historical background. It  
is argued
 by  
some
 that these days, every  
kinds
 of  
knowledge
 are available on internet, owing to this,  
museums
 are no longer needed by the public. I  
largly
 disagree with this notion and this essay intends to explicate that  
museums
 are more  
important
 than internet.
On the one hand, the rapid advancement of technology and internet  
alliws
  peole
 obtain information  
easily
. To elaborate it,  
people
 can search any topic related to  
history
 and culture with the  
help
 of  
internet and
 they can access any kind of  
knowledge
 without face any trouble  
as well
 as without wasting time.  
However
, going to  
museums
 for those materials is definitely waste of time, money and energy. 
On the other hand
, opponents of such a  
thought
 ague against it for several reasons.  
Firstly
,  
museums
 are  
good
 places for local citizens and  
travellers
 to enhance their  
knowledge
 about culture and  
history
.  
Museums
 are the place where experts preserved the country heritages, by paying visit to  
museums
 with family during holidays, young  
people
 are able to  
see
 the country  
histories
.  
Secondly
, it is the best leisure activities, when  
people
 visit  
museums
 the  
see
  many
 traditional paintings and students can learn  
easily
 when they  
see
 paintings and portrait.
By contrast, vast amount of  
knowledge
 on internet is may be  
wrong
, which effects the  
people
's  
knowledge
. Due to this,  
museum
  knowledge
 is more realistic than internet. 
To conclude
, although  
important
  knowledge
 of culture and  
history
 is  
freely
 available on internet, by I believe that  
museums
 are  
still
  good
 place to educate the local residents and even the foreign  
travellers
.