One of the burning issues in today’s world is the accurate method of evaluating students with practical tests instead of traditional written ones. There are some debates over the more usefulness and precision between these two methods and in this essay, I shall discuss both the benefits and negative consequences of this trend.
To begin with, it is widely accepted that the technology has dramatically changed the way we teach and evaluate students. So, in order to follow new and improved developments and methods, we need new techniques in teaching. Therefore, the new trend of evaluating are needed in order that old ones can no longer assess how much students understand their courses. There is a convincing evidence that written exams are time-consuming and cannot illustrate student’s knowledge correctly since some people only memorise everything very fast, but eventually, they forget everything even faster.
Having said that, it must not be ignored that it is actually difficult to score students by their performance even if the practical approach of evaluating is followed. It also depends on the perception of examiners and having experienced teachers in our educational institutes is also a challenge. In addition, more time and money have to be spent on practical tests with fixed criteria of grading. Thus it is the obvious reason why traditional methods have been kept its popularity till now. Additionally, in some courses such as history and so on there are no sufficient requirements on practical assessment, hence traditional methods can estimate appropriately and in areas like this, a combination of exam system should exist.
Overall, despite some drawbacks of practical tests, it has become one of the main procedures of evaluating students recently but written exams are also widely used all around the world. I believe that both types of exams are required for investigating students skills and abilities.
One of the burning issues in
today
’s world is the accurate
method
of
evaluating
students
with
practical
tests
instead
of traditional written
ones
. There are
some
debates over the more usefulness and precision between these two
methods
and in this essay, I shall discuss both the benefits and
negative
consequences of this trend.
To
begin
with, it is
widely
accepted
that the technology has
dramatically
changed
the way we teach and evaluate
students
.
So
, in order to follow new and
improved
developments and
methods
, we need new techniques in teaching.
Therefore
, the new trend of
evaluating
are needed
in order that
old
ones
can no longer assess how much
students
understand their courses. There is a convincing evidence that written exams are time-consuming and cannot illustrate
student’s
knowledge
correctly
since
some
people
only
memorise
everything
very
fast
,
but
eventually
, they forget everything even faster.
Having said that, it
must
not be
ignored
that it is actually difficult to score
students
by their performance even if the
practical
approach of
evaluating
is followed
. It
also
depends on the perception of examiners and having experienced teachers in our educational institutes is
also
a challenge.
In addition
, more time and money
have to
be spent
on
practical
tests
with
fixed
criteria of grading.
Thus
it is the obvious reason why traditional
methods
have been
kept
its popularity till
now
.
Additionally
, in
some
courses such as history and
so
on there are no sufficient requirements on
practical
assessment,
hence
traditional
methods
can estimate
appropriately
and in areas like this, a combination of exam system should exist.
Overall
, despite
some
drawbacks of
practical
tests
, it has become one of the main procedures of
evaluating
students
recently
but
written exams are
also
widely
used
all around the world. I believe that both types of exams
are required
for investigating
students
skills
and abilities.
12Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
23Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
2Mistakes